_files/image001.gif)
|
Canada Lynx Lynx canadensis
Shad Loch Description The lynx is a mid-sized felid with a short tail and broad paws. Its thick dorsal fur is commonly yellowish brown, sometimes with a frosted gray appearance. The fur has variable spots, usually occurring on the sides and legs. Its most distinctive features are the black tufts of hair on the ears that are as long as 50% of the height of the pinna (ear) and large padded feet (Figure 1). Ruffs are also present below the jaws and on the cheeks.
Lynx are
polygynous, where a single male may breed with several females. Mating
occurs in January or February and is marked by an increase of urine marking
and calling to bring the sexes together. Lynx are thought to be
induced ovulators, though they may be spontaneous ovulators when mates are
abundant (Sunquist 2002). Successful breeding is followed by a
gestation period of roughly 62-64 days. The mother
makes
a nest in a hollow tree, stump, log or brush pile by pawing together leaves
and bark. The 175-235 gram (6.17-8.29 oz) kittens are born with their
eyes closed for the first ten days of life. They are browner than the
adults with dark spots that disappear by about nine months of age (Jackson
1961). Lynx generally have one to four young. The number of
kittens per litter is closely tied to the snowshoe hare abundance, for
reasons discussed in the mortality section (Mowat 1999). The kittens
remain dependent on their mothers for milk for four to six months, but began
to consume prey killed by her after one month (Kurta 1995). They may
begin to follow their mother at five weeks of age, and actively participate
in the hunt as early as 7 months of age. Kittens remain with their
mother until they are about 10 months old, but do not obtain full adult size
until they are 2 years of age. When prey is abundant females may breed
for the first time at 10 months of age, otherwise they will wait until they
are 22-23 months of age (Sunquist 2002; Tumlison 1987).
The lynx follows a much
studied population cycle with its number one prey species the snowshoe hare.
The lynx parallels, fairly rigidly, an up and down population cycle of ten
years with the snowshoe. The cycle is created by changes in
reproductive and mortality rates. Female lynx have fewer or no kittens
when hare abundance is down, and more kittens when the population is on the
rise (Mowat 1999). Mortality rates for young and adult lynx vary
significantly depending on the hare cycle, with natural mortality being low
when hares are abundant. Natural mortality is high everywhere when
hare numbers have declined. When food is in short supply, kitten
growth is retarded and few survive (Sunquist 2002). Life expectancy
varies but a rough average is 4 to 6 years in the wild, and is not thought
to surpass 15 years. Lynx in captivity have lived to almost 22 years
of age. Although the primary mortality factor is the scarcity of prey,
namely snowshoe hares, man also causes mortality. The increased price
for lynx pelts has increased the harvest. The lynx is also affected by
external parasites such as Ceratophlyuss denatus and C. labiatus
and internal parasites such as Taenia laticollic and T. rileyi
(Jackson 1961).
Home Range and Social Organization
The lynx is generally a solitary animal
with the males and females avoiding each other except to mate. A lynx
usually inhabits a home range of 10-50km2. The
boundaries are marked with urine and feces and the territories are respected
by both sexes. The lynx is primarily a nocturnal hunter, spending its
days under down trees or rock overhangs (Kurta 1995). A radio
telemetry study of an un-harvested population in the Northwest Territories
Canada has found that lynx densities peaked at 30 animals per 100 km2,
and declined to about three per 100 km2 during the hare crash
(ISEC 2001).
In the lynx, there are two types of dispersal: innate or juvenile dispersal
and environmental dispersal, when adults emigrate in response to significant
prey declines. Most adult dispersal is initiated from March to June following
initial hare decline (Anderson et al. 2003). Long distance movements have been
recorded up to 1,100 km (683.51 mi) in the Yukon. More locally in Minnesota
lynx have been documented to move 483 km (300.12 mi) out of their normal home
range due to lack of prey (Koehler and Aubry 1994). Given the available data
and the propensity of lynx to disperse, at this time it is impossible to
determine with certainty whether reports of lynx in many States were: (1)
merely dispersing animals from northern populations that were effectively lost
from the net population because they did not join or establish resident populations;
(2) animals that were a part of a resident population that persisted for many
generations; or (3) a mixture of both members of resident populations and
dispersing animals (Federal Register 2000).
They hunt by either stalking and rushing
their prey, or waiting along a trail and ambushing it. The lynx
prefers freshly killed prey and only seldom caches a kill for later.
The lynxs large padded feet act like snowshoes in winter; spreading their
weight out over a large surface area so they can walk on top of deep snow
instead of in it (figure 1). This gives them an advantage over most of
their prey species and keeps them on a level playing field with snowshoe
hares. Its preferred habitat is a mature coniferous forest (cedar
swamps and upland forests of hemlock and fir) with thick litter and rotting
logs, this is also the preferred habitat of snowshoe hares (Kurta 1995).
Due to their highly
adapted paws, lynx tend to out-compete other predators such as
martins, fishers, and coyotes in areas of deep snow.
Ecologically, lynx have the advantage over bobcat in areas of deep
snow, whereas bobcats dominate lynx in all other areas. Trapping
continues to be one of the greatest threats for the lynx, and as lynx
are easily trapped, when practiced at times of low population levels
it makes recovery of the population extremely difficult (Sunquist
2002).
Current Management and Legal Status Due to the historical low numbers of lynx in Wisconsin, the federal Endangered Species Act as it pertains to the lynx is a controversial issue. One side wants the protection of possible lynx habitat, even though there is no proof of their existence in the area. The other side of the coin does not want the complete protection called for in the Endangered Species Act for a mammal that has never had a significant population in the state because it jeopardizes human interests such as logging and recreational uses. The lynx is federally listed as a threatened species in the lower 48 states, but as of 1997 Wisconsin de-listed the lynx from the state list of threatened and endangered species. As of 1998 the lynx was designated a protected wild animal in Wisconsin under Administrative Rule NR 10.02 (WDNR, 2003). The issue of listing the lynx is even more heated in Minnesota and western states where more lynx are present. Lynx research consists of monitoring reports of sightings and deaths. While no management plan is being enacted, biologists recommend that large tracts of northern forest be maintained to enable the survival of lynx in Wisconsin. As the human population increases in Wisconsin, the risk of accidental shooting, trapping, and being hit by cars likewise increases for the lynx (WDNR, 2003).
The market for lynx in Alaska, where
trapping is allowed, is showing improvement. Highs of $125 to $140 per pelt
are being commanded, although most are around $80 to $85 with the feet
intact (Dozhier 2004).
Declared an endangered species in 1972 by
the state, the lynxs distribution in Wisconsin is not well known.
The lynx has never been all that common in the state. The fur was
highly desirable, yet only a few pelts were sold each year in Wisconsin in
the early 19th century (Jackson 1961).
The most famous controversy over listing
the lynx as an endangered species was the falsification of lynx hair samples
in Gifford Pinchot National Forest and Wenatchee National Forest in
Washington to prove that lynx inhabited the area and to protect the area.
It was later discovered that the hair sample was from a captive lynx and had
been planted by the U.S. Forest Service biologists. The biologists
responsible for the hoax claim to have been testing the ability of the
laboratory to correctly identify lynx and were not attempting to falsely
increase the range of the lynx (Pierce 2001). A meaningful punishment
was not administered because it is not thought that there was criminal
intent. Instead the forest service administered corrective action,
meaning the employees involved are no longer allowed to work with the lynx
survey (Bosch 2002).
Lynx Skull- http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/specimens/Lynx_canadensis.html http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr30.html http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/factsheets/mammals/lynx.htm http://dnr.wi.gov/org/caer/ce/eek/critter/mammal/lynx.htm For children
Literature CitedAnderson, E. M., M.J. Lovallo. 2004. Wild Mammals of North America. Biology, Management, and Conservation. Second edition G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson, & J. A. Chapman. Pages 758-786. Bosch, M. 2002. Lynx investigation summaries, 2002. United States Forest Service. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/wildlife/carnivore/Lynx/survey.htm Accessed 15 April 2004. Dozhier, Parker. 2004. Fur Market Report. The Trapper and Predator Caller. Vol. 29/3/ page 12-16. Federal Register: March 24, 2000. Rules and Regulations. Volume 65,
Number 58 16051-16086 pp. From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access wais.access.gpo.gov Garman, A.1997. Big Cats Online. http://ds.dial.pipex.com/agarman/canlynx.htm Accessed 15 April 2004. International Society for Endangered Cats Canada (ISEC Canada) 2001. http://www.canuck.com/iseccan/index.html Accessed 15 April 2004 Jackson, H.H.T. 1961. Mammals of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 395-400. Kurta, A. 1995. Mammals of the Great Lakes Region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 252-254. Koehler, G. M., K.B. Aubry. 1994. The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, and Wolverine in the Western United States. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-254, 74-94. McKelvey, K.S., K.B. Aubry, and Y.K. Ortega. 1999. History and Distribution of Lynx in the Contiguous United States. RMRS-GTR-30WWW-Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Hard copy published by the University of Colorado, 207-253. Mowat, G., K.G. Poole, and M. ODonoghue. 1999. Ecology of Lynx in Northern Canada and Alaska. RMRS-GTR-30WWW-Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Hard copy published by the University of Colorado, 265-298. Pierce, J., T. Quinn, and J. Scott. 2001. Statement from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Chief Scientists Regarding the Submittal of False Data for Interagency Lynx Study. http://www.forwolves.org/ralph/lynx-false-wash-state.htm. Sunquist, M.E., F. Sunquist. 2002. Wild cats of the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Pgs. 154-163. Tumlison, R. 1987. Felis lynx. Mammalian species. No. 195-296:269 1-8. WDNR. 2003. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/factsheets/mammals/lynx.htm Accessed 15 April 2004.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||