|
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A frequency distribution is a procedure for describing a set of data. There are two types: ungrouped and grouped.
I. Ungrouped
The following data represent the number of hours of TV viewing per week (X) for 20 people.
| 7 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| 6 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
What follows is an ungrouped frequency distribution for the above data.
| X | f | fr=p | % | Cf | Cp | C% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 5 | 5/20=.25 | 25 | 20=N | 1.00=p | 100 |
| 6 | 5 | .25 | 25 | 15 | .75 | 75 |
| 5 | 4 | .20 | 20 | 10 | .50 | 50 |
| 4 | 3 | .15 | 15 | 6 | .30 | 30 |
| 3 | 0 | .00 | 0 | 3 | .15 | 15 |
| 2 | 3 | .15 | 15 | 3 | .15 | 15 |
| åf=20=N | p=1.00 | %=100 | ||||
How frequently the scores are distributed within the distribution is clearly shown. For example, you can quickly see that half of the people watched 6 or more hours of TV. It is shown in different ways (i.e., f, p, & %). Notice also the Cumulative frequency columns. The concept refers to the frequency of scores falling at or below the upper exact limit. Lastly, note that decimal usage within each column is consistent.
II. Grouped Frequency Distribution
Useful for large data sets and because they make the form or shape of the distribution more obvious. A disadvantage, though, is that the scores lose their individual identity.
| 95 | 88 | 81 | 79 | 73 |
| 92 | 88 | 81 | 79 | 72 |
| 92 | 86 | 81 | 77 | 67 |
| 91 | 85 | 80 | 77 | 62 |
| 89 | 84 | 80 | 74 | 61 |
A simple tally or ungrouped frequency distribution would not be very helpful in this case. What follows is a grouped frequency distribution for this data.
| Interval | Exact Limits | Midpoint | f | p | Cf | C% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95-99 | 94.5-99.5 | 97 | 1 | .04 | 25=N | 100 |
| 90-94 | 89.5-94.5 | 92 | 3 | .12 | 24 | 96 |
| 85-89 | 84.5-89.5 | 87 | 5 | .20 | 21 | 84 |
| 80-84 | 79.5-84.5 | 82 | 6 | .24 | 16 | 64 |
| 75-79 | 74.5-79.5 | 77 | 4 | .16 | 10 | 40 |
| 70-74 | 69.5-74.5 | 72 | 3 | .12 | 6 | 24 |
| 65-69 | 64.5-69.5 | 67 | 1 | .04 | 3 | 12 |
| 60-64 | 59.5-64.5 | 62 | 2 | .08 | 2 | 8 |
| åf=25 | p=1.00 | |||||
Note how easy it is to see the form or shape of the distribution. For example,
it is easy to derive:
| Number Grade |
Letter Grade |
% of Class |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
100 |
||
However, using just the grouped frequency distribution we wouldn't be able to tell exactly what the highest score is (i.e., the individual scores have lost their identity).


So, in our example R = XH - XL + 1 = 95 - 61 + 1 = 35.
Since we have limited space on the screen, an i of 5 was chosen (& thus 7 groups). Note however, that since 61 is not divisible by i, a lowest stated limit of 60 was used which explains why there were actually 8 groups.