Oversight of The Pointer Compact

Will annually review the level of funding for each of the priorities outlined in the Compact and make recommendations to the Chancellor regarding the allocation of funding.
Comprised of eight voting members (six students and two members of the faculty) and three non-voting members (the Vice Chancellors for Student Affairs, Business Affairs, and Academic Affairs).
May at any time request that SGA re-evaluate The Pointer Compact. If SGA finds The Pointer Compact to no longer be successful in accomplishing its purposes, it will forward its findings to campus administration, governance groups, and The Pointer Compact Advisory Board.
May issue a vote of no confidence in The Pointer Compact following a failed evaluation. If The Pointer Compact Advisory Board decides The Pointer Compact is no longer effective, there will be a one-year probationary period of further analysis and gathering of student input. At the end of this probationary period, The Pointer Compact Advisory Board will send a recommendation of action to campus governance groups, the Chancellor, and the Board of Regents. If the Pointer Compact Advisory Board votes a negative appraisal of The Pointer Compact two consecutive years, the Chancellor will also make this recommendation to the Board of Regents.

Will annually review the accountability reports generated by each area receiving revenue to ensure strategic goals are being met

Every five years, The Pointer Compact will be reviewed to ensure that the differential revenue is being used as originally intended; also to allow funding to be redirected if priorities have changed.