Here’s what we learned in
this example:
Our argument is
diagrammed like this:
5) “History can help us
to learn from our mistakes, so everyone should know at least a little
history.”
1. Everyone should know at
least a little history.
2. History can help us to
learn from our mistakes.
2
A
1
Notice that
·
The conclusion
indicator expression “so” tells us that idea 1 is a conclusion supported by
idea 2.
Because the
premise and the inference are both good, this is a good argument.
5) “History can help us
to learn from our mistakes, so everyone should know at least a little
history.”
1. Everyone should know at
least a little history.
2. History can help us to
learn from our mistakes.
2 J
A J J
1
Conclusions of Good Arguments
Although deciding that an
argument is bad tells us nothing about the ultimate conclusion, if we decide
that an argument is good, we should believe that the ultimate conclusion of the
argument is true.
If
we’re faced with arguments for competing positions, and if the arguments for
one side are better than the arguments for the other side (although not
absolutely perfect), philosophy would tell us to believe the position supported
by stronger arguments, at least provisionally.
Many people have difficulty accepting that idea that we should think that the ultimate conclusion is true if we decide that an argument is good. Before we go on to the next example, therefore, let’s play around with this idea some more by taking a look at Zeno’s Paradox.