Here’s what we learned in
this example:
Inference eraser expression
show that an inference isn’t present between two ideas, that neither idea is
being given as reason to believe the other. Inference eraser expressions are “and”
(including equivalent expressions like “moreover,”
and “furthermore”) and “but” (including equivalent expressions like “however,”
and “nevertheless.”)
Our argument is
diagrammed like this:
4) “Ann should major in history since her parents want her to and people should major in whatever their parents want them to.
1. Ann should major in history.
2. Ann’s parents want her to major in history.
3. People should major in whatever their parents want
them to.
2 + 3
A
1
Notice that
·
The reason indicator expression
“since” introduces reasons in the passage.
·
The inference eraser
expression “and” shows that there is no inference between 2 and 3.
·
2 and 3 are added
together in the diagram because we need them to work together to support 1.
Our argument is
evaluated like this:
1. Ann should major in history.
2. Ann’s parents want her to major in history.
3. People should major in whatever their parents want
them to.
2 J + 3 L
A J L
1
Notice how the inference
is good even though premise 3 is false.
The inference is
strong because if Bob believed 2 and 3, he’d be forced to believe 1 as well.
Let’s work through another example.