Criteria
for Evaluation of Research Papers
The following are criteria used to evaluate research papers in Dr. Holland's music history courses. The traits may be broadly separated into two categories: Substantive Aspects (quality of thesis, quality of research, substantiation of thesis) and Mechanical Aspects (sentence structure, paragraph structure, paper organization, and grammar and punctuation). The categories are to be used to characterize the level of achievement displayed by the student in the paper.
| CRITERION |
Exemplary |
Acceptable |
Undeveloped |
| Quality
of Thesis |
Thesis
is clearly defined and clearly articulated. Thesis
addresses issues relevant to the course and the
assignment. |
Thesis
is vague or not relevant to the course or the assignment. |
No
clear thesis is stated. |
| Quality
of Research |
A
variety of sources are consulted, such as standard music
reference works, monographs, articles, and primary
sources. Original research such as interviews,
field studies, or musical analyses may have been
conducted. Sources are appropriately cited in the
body of the paper and listed in a bibliography in an
appropriate format. |
Standard
music reference works and limited other sources were
consulted. Some citations may be missing or
incorrectly formatted. |
Sources
used were only general (non-music specific) references
works or internet sites of unproven quality. Factual
errors may be present. Citations may be largely
absent. |
| Validation
of Thesis |
The
thesis is fully supported by the information provided. |
The
thesis is sometimes contradicted by the information
provided, or some answerable questions are left
unanswered. Some data unrelated to the thesis may
be included. |
The
thesis is either wholly contradicted or otherwise not
supported by the information provided, or a large
quantity of data unrelated to the thesis is included. |
| Sentence
Structure |
Sentences
are complete with correct use of tenses and verb cases.
Antecedents are clear. All words are used in
correct context. |
Paper
contains occasional (averaging less than one per page)
sentences with errors in structure. |
Paper
contains frequent sentences with errors in structure. |
| Paragraph
Structure |
Paragraphs
begin with lead sentences containing important points to
the paper. Lead sentences are followed by other
sentences in the paragraph, all of which elaborate on the
lead point. |
Some
paragraphs lack the focus described above. |
Many
paragraphs contain sentences unrelated to the lead
sentence, or the lead sentence is not substantiated in
the paragraph. |
| Paper
Organization |
The
paper follows a logical progression of arguments or
points supporting the thesis. |
Some
evidence which should have been included is omitted or
not presented progressively. |
The
paper lacks a coherent progression of ideas supporting
the thesis. |
| Grammar/Punctuation |
Grammar
and punctuation use are correct according to standards of
academic writing. Meaning is clear. |
Occasional
errors in grammar or misuses of punctuation. |
Frequent
grammatical or punctuation errors obscure meaning. |