A. INTRODUCTION
Earthquakes are one of the more costly
geologic hazards, both in
terms of loss of life and damages to human
structures.
1. DEATHS
The average, annual, worldwide death toll due to earthquakes in
the
20th Century was close to 15,000 (but none in Wisconsin).
There have been at least 25 earthquakes that
killed
>100,000 at
one
time, and it has been estimated that
100 million people have
died from
earthquakes in the
course of human history!
2. DAMAGES
FEMA
(the Federal Emergency Management Agency)
estimates
that the annual costs to repair earthquake damages in the U.S.
is roughly $4.4 billion.
Fault movement causes shock waves to move out from the
focus
in all
directions. There are two main categories of
shock waves:
1. BODY WAVES
Body (P and S) waves travel within the earth and have
the highest
velocities. P waves travel faster than sound
and
often create noises. S waves, though slower than P
waves,
are more damaging to human structures.
2. SURFACE WAVES
Surface waves travel along the earth's surface. They
have the lowest
velocities, the highest amplitudes,
and
usually
cause the most damage to human structures.
C. EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE
The Richter magnitude scale measures the energy released
during an earthquake based on the maximum amplitude of
ground motion caused by the surface waves (and corrected
for distance from the epicenter). The Richter scale number
is the log10 of the corrected ground motion in microns.
This scale, which is used by seismologists, provides a better
measure of the total energy released during an earthquake
because it considers the amount of movement along the fault,
the rupture area, and the rigidity of the faulted rock.
D. EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE
The Mercalli scale shows earthquake intensity, which is a
measure of an earthquake's effects on humans and
human
structures (buildings,
roads,
bridges,
railroad,
utility lines,
dams, ground
failures, etc.)
2. SPATIAL PATTERNS
One might expect that earthquake intensity should
decrease as
distance from
the epicenter increases. While
this is generally
true,
intensity maps show that there must also be other factors
controlling
the patterns of earthquake damage. For example:
1906
San Francisco Earthquake
1989
Loma Prieta Earthquake (Bay
Bridge)
1994 Northridge Earthquake intensity
map, isoseismal map
The question is: why do intensity maps not look like targets
with
epicenters located at their bulls'
eyes? Hypotheses to consider:
Amplification in the Los Angeles region
Liquefaction: picture, diagram
c. Building design and construction
The principle of resonance