Geography 340

Enviro Records of Candidates & Parties


Thur, 2 Nov:  The Democrats are apoplectic over Nader's candidacy--and desperately willing to smear him in ludicrous ways. Witness an article at Slate which calls Nader a Leninist, and also compares Nader's position to that of the German Communist Party in 1932 which helped bring the Nazis to power!!   "Ralph the Leninist," Jacob Weisberg, Slate, 31 October 2000.

Wed, 1 Nov:  "George W. Bush: The Polluters' Governor," Sierra Club, press release 16 February 2000 (posted at Common Dreams News Center)  [http://www.commondreams.org/news2000/0216-01.htm] -- 

Texas ranks first in toxic releases to the environment, first in total toxic air emissions from industrial facilities, first in toxic chemical accidents, and first in cancer-causing pollution. 

Rather than adopting tough laws to reduce pollution from aging facilities, Gov. George W. Bush asked industry to draft their own regulations to pre-empt legislative action. The result:  only 15 percent of the 760 so-called "grandfathered" plants have signed up for the voluntary program.

Bush appointed oil and petrochemical executives to the state's environmental agency, leading to restrictions on citizen participation in pollution permitting and weaker enforcement.

Texas leads the nation in the number of factories violating clean water standards.

Texas leads the nation in injecting toxic waste into underground wells, disposing 60 percent more toxic waste into injection wells than any other state.  Etc., etc. READ MORE...

"Nader Accepts Gore's Challenge, Invites Comparison Of Environmental Records," Common Dreams News Center, 25 October 2000  [http://www.commondreams.org/news2000/1025-04.htm] -- 

“Al Gore is suffering from election-year delusion,” Mr. Nader told reporters today, “if he thinks his record on the environment is anything to be proud of.  He should be held accountable by voters for eight years of principles betrayed and promises broken.  A broad spectrum of voters from diverse political persuasions are willing to stand for stand environmental policies and against the corrupt corporate politics of the two-party system.”  READ MORE about Nader's enviro positions, and his criticism of Gore's

Excerpt from Al Gore: A User's Manual, by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair, San Francisco Bay Guardian, 25 October 2000  [http://www.sfbayguardian.com/News/35/04/04gore.html] --

The green game

The first environmental promise Al Gore made in the 1992 campaign, he soon shattered. It involved the WTI hazardous waste incinerator in East Liverpool, Ohio, built on a floodplain near the Ohio River. The plant, one of the largest of its kind in the world, was scheduled to burn 70,000 tons of hazardous waste a year in a spot only 350 feet from the nearest house. A few hundred yards away is East Elementary School, which sits on a ridge nearly eye-level with the top of the smokestack.

On July 19, 1992, Gore gave one of his first campaign speeches on the environment, across the river from the incinerator, in Weirton, West Virginia, hammering the Bush Administration for its plans to give the toxic waste burner a federal air permit. "The very idea is just unbelievable to me," Gore said. "I'll tell you this, a Clinton-Gore Administration is going to give you an environmental presidency to deal with these problems. We'll be on your side for a change." ...

Shortly after the election, Gore assured the neighbors of the incinerator that he hadn't forgotten about them. "Serious questions concerning the safety of the East Liverpool, Ohio, hazardous waste incinerator must be answered before the plant may begin operation," Gore wrote. "The new Clinton/Gore administration will not issue the plant a test burn permit until all questions concerning compliance with the plant have been answered."

But that never happened. Instead, the EPA quietly granted the WTI facility its test burn permit. The tests failed, twice. In one trial burn, the incinerator eradicated only 7 percent of the mercury found in the waste, when it was supposed to burn away 99.9 percent. A few weeks later the EPA granted WTI a commercial permit anyway. They didn't tell the public about the failed tests until afterward.

Gore claimed his hands were tied by the Bush Administration, which had promised WTI the permit only a few weeks before the Clinton team took office. But by one account, William Reilly, Bush's EPA director, met with Gore's top environmental aide Katie McGinty in January 1993 and asked her if he should begin the process of approving the permit. In this version of events apparently McGinty told Reilly to proceed. McGinty said later that she had no recollection of the meeting.

Gore persisted in maintaining that there was nothing he could do about it once the permit was granted. A 1994 report on the matter from the General Accounting Office flatly contradicted him, saying the plant could be shut down on numerous grounds, including repeated violations of its permit....

The decision to go soft on WTI may have had something to do with its powerful financial backer. The construction of the incinerator was partially underwritten by Jackson Stephens, the Arkansas investment king who helped bankroll the Clinton-Gore campaign. According to EPA whistleblower Hugh Kaufman, during the period when the WTI financing package was being put together Stephens Inc. was represented by Webb Hubbell, who later came into Clinton's Justice Department and was indicted during the Whitewater investigation, and the Rose law firm, to which Hillary Clinton belonged. Over the ensuing seven years, the WTI plant has burned nearly a half-million tons of toxic waste, 5,000 truckloads of toxic material every year, spewing chemicals such as mercury, lead and dioxin out of its stacks and onto the surrounding neighborhoods. The inevitable illnesses have followed....

Wed, 11 Oct:  Gore's No Environmentalist,  Michael Donnelly and Jeffrey St. Clair, The Oregonian, 9 October 2000 [http://www.commondreams.org/views/101000-103.htm ] --

One-out-of-six old growth trees [in the Pacific Northwest] that still existed when Clinton and Gore came to office are now stumps-- trees that were off limits to the chainsaws under Bush, Sr. 

The creation of Foundation-funded, Democrat-sycophant "green" groups may have worked in the past, but it's now "fool me twice, shame on me" time. Without a record worthy of standing on, Gore now relies on fear inflation solely. A message that, "Bush will be worse" just doesn't hold up given the real record of Al Gore. He really will do and say anything to get elected.