Plastics, pesticides, and other POPs  PlasticsIcon.gif (1309 bytes)

About Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)


(Note: The information in A.-C. below is adapted from the optional "Provisional Background Statement and POPS Elimination Platform," issued by the International POPs Elimination Network, October 1998.)

A.  What are POPs?

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are carbon-based chemical compounds and mixtures that include industrial chemicals like PCBs, pesticides like DDT and unwanted wastes like dioxins. POPs are primarily products and by-products of human industry that are of relatively recent origin.

B.  What important qualities do POPs have?

POPs released to the environment can travel through air and water to regions far distant from their original source. In these distant regions, POPs can concentrate in living organisms, including humans, to levels with the potential to injure human health and/or the environment. Most POPs have a number of common properties:

1.  POPs are persistent in the environment-- they resist photolytic, chemical and biological degradation;

2.  POPs generally are semi-volatile-- they evaporate relatively slowly. Persistent substances with this property tend to enter the air, travel long distances on air currents, and then return to earth. The colder the climate, the less POPs tend to evaporate, resulting in their migration to regions such as the Arctic, thousands of kilometers away from their original sources;

3.  POPs generally have low water solubility (they do not dissolve readily in water) and high lipid (fat) solubility (they do dissolve easily in fats and oils). Persistent substances with these properties bioaccumulate in fatty tissues of living organisms. In the environment, concentrations of these substances can increase by factors of many thousands or millions as they move up the food chain; and

4.  POPs are toxic, and have the potential to injure human and other organisms even at low concentrations. Some POPs at extraordinarily low concentrations can attach to intercellular receptor sites in the body and trigger a cascade of potentially harmful effects.

C.  How can POPs cause injury?

Some populations of humans and some wildlife species are known to suffer significant injury from certain POPs in polar and temperate regions. There are fewer studies that document health injury in tropical regions caused by POPs in the environment. It stands to reason, however, that if POPs can injure human health and ecosystems thousands of kilometers from their sources, POPs can cause similar and even greater injury in and near source areas. Absence of well-documented evidence does not mean absence of harm.

Interest and concern regarding POPs dates to the late 1960s, when scientists began compiling evidence of injury to fish, birds and mammals in or around the Great Lakes. In some of these cases, the predominant POPs sources were relatively nearby; in others, they were thousands of kilometers distant. Documented injuries were especially prevalent in high predator species and included: (a) reproductive failure and population decline; (b) abnormally functioning thyroids and other hormone system dysfunctions; (c) feminization of males and masculinization of females; (d) compromised immune systems; (e) behavioral abnormalities; (f) tumors and cancers; and (g) gross birth defects.

Alarmed by these findings, scientists investigated similar injury to humans, who, after all, can also be considered high predators. In the years that followed, good evidence was gathered associating human exposure to specific POPs or classes of POPs with: (a) cancers and tumors at multiple sites; (b) neurobehavioral impairment including learning disorders, reduced performance on standard tests and changes in temperament; (c) immune system changes; (d) reproductive deficits and sex-linked disorders; (e) a shortened period of lactation in nursing mothers; and (f) diseases such as endometriosis, increased incidence of diabetes, and others. Of particular concern is evidence suggesting that women, infants, and children are especially vulnerable to certain effects of POPs.

In people as in wildlife, injury caused by exposure to POPs is often expressed, not in the exposed adult population, but in the offspring generation. Maternal body burdens of POPs are transferred through the placenta to the developing fetus and through breast milk to the nursing infant, and can cause injury at vulnerable stages of development that may not be expressed until the infant reaches puberty or adulthood.

In the early decades of this century, POPs were virtually non-existent in the environment. Production and generation of POPs expanded dramatically following World War II. Today, ecosystems and ordinary food supplies in most regions of the world, especially fish, meat and dairy products, tend to be contaminated by POPs. Both people and wildlife, everywhere in the world, carry body burdens of POPs at or near levels that can-- and in some cases clearly do-- cause injury to human health and to entire ecosystems.

People are generally exposed to POPs through their food supply, although workers and residents of communities near POPs sources can also be exposed through inhalation and skin contact. POPs exposures are often great in peoples whose diets include large amounts of wild food and especially big fish, marine mammals and other aquatic resources. Some of the best-documented, highly exposed populations are aboriginal peoples living in polar regions far distant from most POPs sources, such as the Inuit who live in the circumpolar region. But ordinary domesticated meat and milk products can also be significantly contaminated by POPs in tropical and temperate areas. The same POPs that travel long distances on air currents, can also travel shorter distances, contaminating pastures where livestock graze.

D.  Optional:   Information about "Taking action on POPs" and the proposed international "POPs Elimination Platform"

E.  Faults in U.S. chemical-use system include:

LightsAnim1textJ.gif (6373 bytes)
Government approved dioxin...

F.  Some basic causes

Ignorance, attitude, and corporate capitalism are significant basic causes of chemical contamination of our environment:

G.  Four examples of POPs

1.  Trichloroethylene (TCE) TCE2.gif (2553 bytes) [C2HCl3]

2.  Pentachlorophenol (PCP or penta) pentachlorophenol2.gif (4011 bytes) [C6Cl5OH]

3.  PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) PCB2.gif (4065 bytes) [C12H2Cl8]

4.  PBBs (polybrominated biphenyls) PBB2.gif (4070 bytes) [C12H4Br6]


Course Home / This Unit Intro

Thomas Detwyler maintains this page (tdetwyle@uwsp.edu)
Last updated 13 March 2001