Picture (424x84, 9.6Kb) Picture (130x106, 5.2Kb)

Picture (223x149, 1.4Kb)

 

Picture (13x13, 101 bytes) Back

 

Picture (18x18, 256 bytes) Leslie's Homepage

 

Picture (18x18, 256 bytes) Contact Leslie

 


Course Components & Links 


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Course Overview


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Assignments


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Navigating the Information Highway 


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Step 1 - Beginning Questions


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Step 2 - Backwards design


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Philosophy portion 


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes)  Webquests


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Grading rubrics


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes)  Related Links


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes) Graduate exam questions


Picture (17x17, 591 bytes)  

�Leslie Owen Wilson 2004,  restrictions on usage

Instructional Development: The Backwards Processes

A. Identify Ends - Instructional ends should be part of your vision of the learner, or what you envision for the learner as he/she leaves your realm of influence. Specifically, what do you want him/her to know and retain. What should they understand and be able to do? Stated ends may involve:

  1. State or national standards, or specified district benchmarks or aims
  2. Knowledge, content, skills, or processes that are enduring
  • worth being familiar with
  • at the heart of a discipline
  • important to know
  • engaging and motivating
  • highly relevant to students= futures
  • needing uncoverage "(list from McTighe and Wiggins, Understanding by Design, ASCD)

Please remember just because materials are in a textbook, they still may not meet these tests, or may not be important enough for your students to know and understand! Use you professional judgment and your district�s curriculum make these determinations.

B. Expand or recombine - Can specified ends be broken down into smaller pieces (such as general knowledge, specific skills and performances, or observed behavioral objectives), or compressed, integrated with other subject areas, or combined into a comprehensive problem, simulations, or self-directed investigation?

C. Acceptable evidence -

  1. What evidence will prove that students have mastered the objectives or completed the problem?
  2. What will they, or should they, be able to do to give evidence of mastery?
  3. Can these skills or this evidence be placed in a graduated rubric that has clearly stated parameters for each level of gradation (i.e. unacceptable, acceptable, exemplary, or at introductory, practiced, or mastered levels?

D. Plan instructional methods and procedures -

  1. Plan means of instruction that match all of the above.
  2. Choose teaching models that are directly related to what you want to do. In doing this it is important to consider evidence of "best practice," effectiveness of chosen methodology, recent research on learning and retention, and an array models of instruction.
  3. Re-evaluate developed curricula in light of students� progress and understanding revising portions and tasks where needed. This must be done at regular intervals to assure that the delivered instruction matches the intended curriculum.

�Wilson, L. (2002)Backwards 1


Picture (147x105, 1.6Kb)  

Return Leslie's Main Page Curriculum Index Creativity Index Theories of Learning Index Sample Lesson Plans

Picture (480x327, 7.7Kb)Contact Leslie

copyright Leslie Owen Wilson, 1997, 2001, 2003