CSS: General |
Presentation
CEP 910 Notes
Tacit goal is often fostering long-term commitment to desirable behavior, not just completing the current task
Questions p. 2-3, Brophy
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Check out Dweck, attribution retraining
Have to fight any entity definition from learners, regarding why they can't do something; have to focus (and focus them) on what they can change
Dweck analyzing boys and girls praised and criticized
Optimal motivation, not maximal motivation (too much pressure and/or anxiety interferes with performance) (a curvilinear relationship)
sufficient ability and reasonable effort
Goal disengagement, re-engagement: need to differentiate between relatively great and small goals at different points of life (learning to snowboard, becoming associate dean)
An uninformed interviewer may help validity, because he doesn't know what he's looking for
___ check out Frank Bajaras' website
think: people's personal theories about probability interacting with their efficacy/expectancy beliefs
thinking about competition: whether there should be high scores in TE 150 games
Trying to beat Microsoft by designing something better
Big ideas as the basic for authentic activities
Brophy says don't conflate disciplines with K-12 curriculum subject areas
the three pressures on curriculum: enduring knowledge (including the disciplines), students, society
So the curriculum has to be negotiated, and prioritized
Looking at behaviorism and extrinsic rewards
The overjustification effect
Retroactive self-explanations about why we do stuff
Separating extrinsic and intrinsic scales; it's not a teeter-totter
===
Scaffolding choice-making ability, helping students see the learning opportunities in challenge
"buyer's regret"
Students making choices about courses in high school and how that affects their future choices in the long-term
risk and choice go together. Real choices mean real risk, yet choices must be real to have significant motivation benefits
Connect choice to the 4 square that includes Authoritative parenting: the value of caring and structure
From Waterman et al. (2003), people may choose activities based on criteria other than balance of ability and challenge, to why we need the value side to explain some choices and behaviors (e.g., not pursuing a "professional" path because of qualitative differences between the experience/lifestyle of hobbyist vs. pro)
Brophy would equate relevance cues with socializing motivation to learn, establishing connections to outside contexts
Mayer et al. 2004, personalizing boosts learning
2005/03/29
impulsive vs. cognitive style
recall Emmons Lake and their emphasis on multiple intelligences
multiple mentors, Becky Packard
2005/04/05
self-verification
Speech and ed tech: two areas with knowledge, skills, literacy, and fluency, but taught "within" other areas. Better to teach these directly, e.g., teach the content or teach the technology
Considering this course if only women or if only men: gender balanced, suppressed voices