|
Review of Proposals:
What WEEB Wants
|
|
The WEEB appoints a panel to evaluate
applications. The panel will check proposals for technical
completeness and evaluate their merit as projects.
Refer to the fundamental tenets of environmental education, the EE2010
goals, and the Quality Assurance Checklist for the
criteria. Prior year review forms are available on this
website (see links to left).
Large, small, and mini-grants are evaluated
separately.
To receive full consideration,
make sure the minimum criteria for funding summarized in the
Quality Assurance Checklist are met.
Reviewers will look for:
- Compliance with minimum criteria for funding. (Jump
to Quality Assurance Checklist)
- What the project will
accomplish.
- Relationship of project to an EE2010 goal. (Jump
to EE2010)
- How project/activities are tied to the fundamental
tenets of environmental education. (Jump
to EE tenets)
- Details of the
anticipated benefit to members of the target audience(s)
including justification for the identified project need(s)
- What activities will
result in this benefit. (Specifically, who will do it, where
will it be done, and when and how long will it be done.)
- How the anticipated
benefit to the target audience(s) will be measured. (How evidence of goal accomplished
will be provided.)
- Mechanism(s) for sharing
what was done with others
- Project continuation beyond the WEEB grant cycle.
- Appropriateness of
audience, activities, timelines, staff qualifications, and
anticipated benefits as they relate to budget requests.
|
|
|
