The Wisconsin Environmental Education Board reminds applicants
that the grant program uses a competitive review process to
select grant recipients. A proposal funded during one grant
cycle may not be funded during a subsequent cycle because it
will be competing against a different pool of proposals.
Please see the "Tips and Suggestions" and "Review of
Proposals" sections for additional information regarding
maximizing the competitiveness of a proposal.
However, please be advised that
if the proposal makes it through the technical review stage,
and is therefore sent on to merit review, historically it
has had a very good chance of being funded. Proposals
eliminated at the technical review stage have failed to meet
all the minimum criteria for funding as outlined in the
quality assurance
checklists.
Please do not "tie the
Board's hands." The WEEB can only fund a proposal, if it meets
all the minimum criteria as outlined within the
quality assurance checklists.General Proposals
Summary of 2007-2008
(55% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
20 |
18 |
9 |
|
Small |
51 |
45 |
30 |
Summary of 2006-2007
(53% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
13 |
8 |
4 |
|
Small |
36 |
32 |
22 |
Summary of 2005-2006
(55% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
14 |
10 |
10 |
|
Small |
41 |
32 |
20 |
Summary of
2004-2005
(57% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
16 |
11 |
7 |
|
Small |
38 |
34 |
24 |
Forestry Proposals
Summary of
2007-2008
(70% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Small |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
Large |
13 |
11 |
10 |
Summary of
2006-2007
(58% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Small |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Large |
19 |
18 |
11 |
Summary of
2005-2006
(57% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Small |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Large |
19 |
14 |
10 |
Summary of 2004-2005
(32% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
Small |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Large |
30 |
24 |
10 |
School Forest Proposals
Summary of
2007-2008
(81% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
Small |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Large |
13 |
11 |
8 |
Summary of
2006-2007
(91% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Small |
27 |
27 |
27 |
|
Large |
7 |
5 |
4 |
Summary of
2005-2006
(62% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Small |
15 |
11 |
10 |
|
Large |
18 |
15 |
10 |
Summary of
2004-2005 School Forest Proposals
(70% funded)
|
|
# Received |
# On to
Merit Review |
# Funded |
|
Mini |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
Small |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Large |
7 |
6 |
5 |
