|
Click here for a printable version
(PDF) of the Summer 2005 issue. Lake
Tides - The
newsletter for people interested in Wisconsin Lakes
- a quarterly publication of the University
of Wisconsin-Extension Lakes Program - part of the
Wisconsin Lakes
Partnership.
Volume 30 No. 3 Summer 2005
Text-only version (HTML format)
What Have You Done for Me Lately? A Quick Glance at Lake
Grants
Blue-Green Algae
Welcome! Partnership Newcomers
New Edition of Lake District Guide
Pier Rules Moving Ahead (NR 326)
Wisconsin's Shoreland Management Program (NR 115
Update)
Lake Districts Q&A
Hydrilla? Don't you mean Godzilla?
Heron Majesty
Partners in Preservation: Saving Through Land Trusts
Volunteer Monitoring Update: The 2005 Great North
American Secchi Dip-IN
Hands
Across the Water: 2006 Wisconsin Lakes Convention Call for
Presenters
New Study of Atrazine in Lakes
One Fish...Two Fish...What Fish? Who Fish?
Calendar
Reflections
What Have You Done
for Me Lately? A Quick Glance at Lake Grants
During the past 15 years,
over $30 million has been invested for the management and
protection of Wisconsin’s lakes through 1,464 grants. The grants,
awarded by the Wisconsin Lakes Partnership, are funded by a
portion of the excise tax on gasoline sales that is attributed to
motor boat usage. How has this money been invested? Is Wisconsin’s
lake grants program serving its purpose?
Three related funding opportunities exist within
the lake grants program: lake planning grants, lake protection and
classification grants and, currently in their second year, aquatic
invasive species control grants.
Lake Planning Grants
Lake planning grants (up to $10,000) began in 1990
with many of the early projects involving water quality
monitoring. This data collection is an important first step toward
setting lake management goals. Projects involving watershed
analyses, nutrient budgets, plant surveys, habitat analyses,
educational programs and social surveys often follow in
larger-scale, phased lake management planning projects.
To date, nearly 1,200 lake planning grants have
been awarded, providing nearly $10 million worth of state
financial assistance. On top of that, local matching contributions
exceed
$3 million including the investment of thousands
of hours of volunteer time. Because of this we have a wealth of
information on water quality, watersheds, nutrient budgets,
aquatic plants, habitat, and recreational use of the waters of
Wisconsin.
Not only have these grants helped organizations
gather information and data about Wisconsin lakes, but management
plans have been implemented that will help preserve lakes and the
quality of our experience while visiting them. The Cloverleaf
Lakes Protective
Association in Shawano County provides one
example. With the help of lake planning grants, the folks at
Cloverleaf gathered water quality data, surveyed aquatic plants,
and prepared base lake and watershed maps. Working with the
public, they developed management recommendations and currently
are in the middle of a three-year grant-funded project to get
control over a Eurasian watermilfoil infestation. In 2005, the
Town of Belle Plaine and the Association partnered to purchase
some remaining undeveloped shoreline with a $189,000 lake
protection grant.
Lake Protection and Classification Grants
Since 1994, lake protection and classification
grants (up to $200,000) have provided funds to organizations to
help implement lake management plans, purchase property and
conservation easements, restore wetlands and shorelands, develop
ordinances and implement county lake classification projects.
While lake protection and classification grants
make up less than 20% (272) of the total number of grants awarded
in the lake grants program, their awards total over $20 million,
two-thirds of the total monetary amount awarded to date. Lake
classification grants have enabled counties to increase the
minimum lot size and enact other zoning improvements to protect
thousands of smaller lakes (generally less than 100 acres)
throughout the northern part of the state from over-development.
In their first five years of existence, lake
protection grants helped organizations acquire nearly 3,500 acres
of land, and that amount continues to grow. In 2000, grant funds
helped the Natural Heritage Land Trust purchase 117 acres along
Fish Lake in Dane County. The property includes 1,600 feet of
lakeshore frontage. Three years ago, Washburn County purchased
Hallstrom Woods with assistance from a lake protection and
classification grant. This 596-acre property completely
encompasses the frontage and access of a 44.5 acre wild lake,
several wetlands, and a majority of the upland watershed for the
lake. Organizations throughout the state are purchasing land and
conservation easements to ensure that gems like these remain
preserved for generations to come.
AIS Control Grants
As the threat of invasive species continues to
grow in Wisconsin, aquatic invasive species control grants have
been made available to support local efforts in preventing and
controlling aquatic invasive species infestations. Awards range
from $10,000 for projects involving identification and removal of
new infestations, to $75,000 for projects involving education,
prevention, planning or the restoration of native plant species.
Sixty-eight aquatic invasive species control
grants have been awarded, providing funds for organizations to
develop plans, eradicate and control purple loosestrife and
Eurasian watermilfoil, and conduct whole-lake treatments of
aquatic invasive species. Although this particular grant
opportunity is new, awareness of the threat that invasive species
pose is not. As early as 1991, a lake planning grant was awarded
to the Round Lake Property Owners Association to study Eurasian
watermilfoil in Big Round Lake in Sawyer County. The aquatic
invasive species control grants will continue to be an important
funding opportunity for organizations in their efforts to battle
this growing threat to our native species, ecosystems, local
economies, and recreational activities.
What’s Your Story?
The distribution of lake grants awarded – in
numbers and dollars – somewhat mirrors the distribution of
Wisconsin’s lakes with roughly one-third of all lake grants
awarded to the northern region of the state. The northeast and
southeast regions have received 21% and 18%, respectively, of the
lake planning grants awarded followed by the west central (15%)
and south central (10%) regions. Among lake protection grants,
including aquatic invasive species control grants, the northeast
and south central regions of the state have each received just
over 20%, followed by the southeast region (16%) and the west
central region (10%).
So no matter where you’re located in Wisconsin,
lake grants are certainly providing financial assistance to
organizations concerned with management of Wisconsin lakes. But
are Wisconsin lakes being protected? Only time (and long-term
trend data) will tell for sure. The DNR will be conducting the
most comprehensive review of lake quality trends this year in
preparation for its biennial federal Water Quality Report to
Congress. However, in the interim, the DNR wants to ask the people
working to protect these resources what they think. Are lake
grants helping you protect your lake? Email your lake grant
stories and experiences to Carroll.Schaal@dnr.state.wi.us or mail
them to Carroll Schaal, DNR, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707-7921.
Lake grant stories will be shared in future issues of Lake Tides.
by Marilyn Leffler and Carroll Schaal,
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
back to top
Blue-Green Algae
It has been a hot summer in
Wisconsin. On some lakes, remarkable smells are wafting on the
breeze and beaches are closing. Sometimes the odors and
green cover over the water are caused by blue-green algae, a group
of algae that is making the news these days. So what exactly is
this stuff?
To have a basis for talking about blue-green algae
we need to put them into a basic biological and ecological
context. One of the first things we learn about biology in school
is that living things are made up of cells. There are two types of
cells – the more ancient and less specialized cells like those in
bacteria (the fancy word for them is prokaryotes) and the larger,
more specialized cells like those of plants, animals, and fungi
(these cell types are called eukaryotes).
Our biology teacher also told us that ecosystems
have three types of organisms that interact to manipulate matter
and energy. There are producers that can make their own food
(usually by photosynthesis), consumers that eat pre-existing food
items, and decomposers that digest dead and dying material for
food. In lake systems, decomposers include bacteria and fungi
while consumers are all animals from the single-celled protozoans
to snails to the fish and birds. Producers are submerged or
emergent plants and algae.
The term algae (which is plural, the singular is
alga) is a non-technical term for a dozen or so different groups
of photosynthetic organisms that are not plants. Basically, if
it’s a producer and a botanist doesn’t call it a plant, then it’s
an alga. These algal groups include prokaryotes and eukaryotes and
range from microscopic single-celled organisms to massive,
multicellular kelps (that grow over a hundred feet in length) and
seaweeds found in the ocean. Algae can contain pigments that will
make it nearly any color you can think of – red, brown, green, and
blue-green are the most common. A typical Wisconsin lake might
have representatives of six or seven of these algal groups
throughout the year.
Two of the more common algal groups in the Midwest
include green algae that often accumulate in massive amounts
during the summer, forming slippery, golden-brown mats in rocks
and sediments that receive light; and blue-green algae that can
form mats on the bottom or float free in the water column.
The blue-green algae are more precisely referred
to as Cyanobacteria and they are often a major component of our
lakes. They are the only prokaryote algae, and fossil evidence
indicates that the process of photosynthesis first occurred in the
blue-green algae about 3 billion years ago. They are the oldest
group of producers on the planet and over this time scale they
have adapted to nearly every habitat on Earth (fresh and salt
water from frozen pack ice to boiling hot springs, soil, on/in
plants, on/in rocks, on/in animals). Biologists believe several
thousand species of blue-green algae may exist.
While prokaryotes are usually considered
unspecialized organisms, some of the blue-green algae can produce
specialized cells. One of these cells is a very resistant spore
stage called an akinete. It can tolerate very harsh conditions,
even those that kill the regular blue-green algal cells. The other
important specialized cell is called a heterocyst and it can do a
very rare thing – convert atmospheric nitrogen (nitrogen gas) into
a form of inorganic nitrogen that algae and other plants can use.
Nitrogen gas, while plentiful (80% of atmosphere), is inert and
unusable by algae and plants. Nitrogen can be a scarce nutrient in
some ecosystems and the ability to convert nitrogen gas into a
usable form gives the blue-greens a substantial advantage under
those conditions. These important cellular adaptations and the
fact that these ancient organisms have an amazingly adaptable
physiology allow them to tolerate conditions that kill most other
algae and most plants.
Blue-green algae range from single-celled to
colonies of cells enclosed in a sticky sheath to filaments of
cells that may be branched or unbranched and may have a sheath.
The sheath is important for blue-greens because critters that eat
algae have a hard time digesting the material, which tends to
stick in mouth parts and digestive systems. That means most
animals shy away from eating blue-greens. This gives blue-green
algae an advantage over other algae which do not produce such a
sheath. As more easily digested algae are consumed by a lake’s
animals, ever larger populations of blue-green algae are left
behind.
If you put all these advantages together –
tolerant of extreme and variable conditions, hardy survival stage,
nitrogen manipulation, adaptable physiology, and nasty sheath –
you get a group of organisms that is hard to control. Under some
conditions they can dominate a lake to the point of rendering it
barely navigable, smelly and unpleasant to swim in, and
potentially toxic. There are a variety of blue-green algal toxins
and they can produce potentially serious liver and/or central
nervous system problems. The first officially autopsied human
death attributed to ingestion of blue-green algae toxin occurred
in Dane County last year, where a teenager died after diving and
splashing around in an algae-covered golf course pond.
So why aren’t all lakes overrun by out-of-control
populations of crazed blue-green algae? Lakes generally have
enough nitrogen, but not the high amount of phosphorus that
blue-green algae need. This is the one advantage we have over the
blue-greens. Lakes that are low in phosphorus generally face less
of a problem with blue-green algae. This advantage is lost when
phosphorus runs into the lake from outside sources such as leaky
septic systems, lawn fertilizers, underlying lake sediments, or
other watershed inputs (agriculture, municipal, industrial). Once
this advantage is lost it is hard to regain because biological
systems are very good at trapping and recycling important
nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus.
A final point to remember, all lakes are destined
to accumulate nutrients and sediments with increasing amounts of
plant and algal growth over time and eventually most will fill in.
The natural time frame for this could be thousands or tens of
thousands of years if outside and/or human inputs are minimal.
With human inputs accelerating the process it could be hundreds or
thousands of years instead (or less). Many of our lakes in
Wisconsin have had human inputs long enough to begin showing this
acceleration of lake aging, called eutrophication. Lake algal
surveys (especially when combined with watershed and water
chemistry analysis) provide a snapshot of where a lake is on this
continuum by evaluating the type and amount of blue-green algae
present in the system.
by Dr. Robert Bell, Professor and Chairman,
UW-Stevens Point Department of Biology. At UWSP, a
multi-disciplinary team of biology and water specialists from the
Department of Biology and the College of Natural Resources work
together to evaluate Wisconsin’s lakes.
back to top
Welcome!
The Wisconsin Lakes Partnership welcomes the
following people to the Lakes Team:
Kim Becken
Office Manager, UW-Extension Lakes Program
Kim comes to the Lakes program after assisting the
Biology Department at UW-Stevens Point for the past nine years.
Kim will assist UWEX and DNR personnel as well as the general
public. She will help coordinate the Wisconsin Lakes Convention,
Lake Leaders Institute, Lake Tides newsletter, and other
Wisconsin Lakes Partnership publications and events.
Contact Kim for help with finding publications or
to assist with any lake-related questions at 715/346-2116 or
kbecken@uwsp.edu.
Kevin Gauthier
Lake Coordinator, Northern Region, WDNR
Kevin is the new Lake Coordinator located in
Rhinelander. Since 2001, he served as a WDNR Fisheries Creel
Survey Technician working out of Woodruff. Kevin will be the lead
technical contact person for the nine counties in the eastern half
of the northern region (Forest, Florence, Iron, Langlade, Lincoln,
Oneida, Price, Taylor and Vilas) for nonfisheries lake management
issues including lake grant projects and aquatic plant management.
Contact Kevin at 715/358-9231 or gauthk@dnr.state.wi.us.
Tim Asplund
Statewide Aquatic Ecologist/Limnologist, WDNR
Tim will support DNR regional lake coordinators,
lake research scientists, citizen lake monitors, lake consultants
and lake organizations to ensure lake management policies and
activities maximize lake ecosystem health while meeting local
community needs. Besides extensive work with groundwater
legislation, Tim worked as a lake research scientist monitoring
lake ecosystems, developing new approaches for managing shallow
lakes and exploring the impacts of motorboats on Wisconsin lakes.
Tim can be contacted at 608/267-7602 or tim.asplund@dnr.state.wi.us.
back to top
New Edition
of
Lake District Guide
How do we form a lake district? What legal
procedures does our lake district need to follow? How do we
incorporate? What about voting?
For over 30 years, the Guide to Wisconsin’s Lake
Management Law has been a fundamental tool for people with lake
organizational questions. This year the guide is getting a
facelift, along with some major changes we hope will make it even
better. For this new (11th edition) of the publication, the guide
has been split into two books with new titles and much more
information. They will incorporate recent legal changes to the
lake district law from Wisconsin Act 275, along with specific
requirements, procedures and helpful suggestions.
New technologies and the growth of the internet
are changing the way we get our information. To keep your
information fresh we will be offering an online version where you
can always get the latest edition of the guide, laws, regulations,
forms and contact information.
Look for the 11th edition coming soon!
back to top
Pier Rules Moving Ahead (NR
326)
Adoption of final revisions to NR 326, the state’s
pier rules, is tentatively scheduled for the September 2005
meeting of the Natural Resources Board. More than 300 citizens and
organizations commented on a rule developed by a citizen
Stakeholder Group last fall. DNR staff are making changes in
response to those comments and preparing a final proposal for
consideration by the Board. After the Natural Resources Board
adopts final rule revisions, the rules are submitted to the
legislature for committee review. Hopefully the revised NR 326
will go into effect in late 2005. Stay tuned on the progress of
rule revisions at the following DNR web page:
http://dnr.wi.gov/org/water/fhp/waterway/piers.shtml. You can
also find information and brochures on current pier regulations at
this website.
by Lisa Lehmann
Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources
back to top
Wisconsin's Shoreland Management Program (NR 115)
The Wisconsin DNR needs your comments on the NR
115 proposal! Comments will be accepted until August 26, 2005.
You can review the proposal at
http://dnr.wi.gov/org/water/wm/dsfm/shore/news.htm. Comments
can be emailed to toni.herkert@dnr.state.wi.us or sent to Toni
Herkert, Wisconsin DNR - WT/2, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI,
53707-7921. A comment form is included on the website to assist
you in organizing your comments.
Wisconsin’s Shoreland Protection Program, found in
Chapter NR 115 of Wisconsin Administrative Code, contains
statewide minimum standards for shoreland development that are
designed to protect water quality, fish and wildlife habitat and
scenic beauty along navigable lakes and rivers. The revision
effort seeks to protect public rights in navigable waters while
allowing property owners the flexibility necessary to make
reasonable use of their properties.
back to top
Lake Districts Q&A
We often get phone calls and emails from Lake
Tides readers with a variety of questions about lake districts. Do
you have a question about lake districts that you would like to
see answered in Lake Tides? Send it to uwexlakes@uwsp.edu so we
can include it in a future issue.
Q: Are lake districts a unit of government?
A: Yes
Unlike a lake association, a lake district is
actually a governmental body, similar to a town or county (but
often without paid staff). As such, there are certain rights and
responsibilities that come along with being a unit of government.
First and foremost, lake districts MUST follow
Chapter 33 of the Wisconsin Statutes, the chapter that sets forth
the legal powers and operations of lake districts. A copy of
Chapter 33 can be found on the Wisconsin legislature’s website:
http://www.legis.state.wi.us/statutes/Stat0033.pdf
A lake district has statutory responsibilities to
the waterbody, local citizens and taxpayers. Some of those
responsibilities include things like public notices, open meetings
and open records laws. More detailed information can be found
online at:
http://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/uwexlakes/districts
back to top
Hydrilla? Don't you mean Godzilla?
What a monster! Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata)
is considered the most problematic aquatic plant in the United
States, although it has not yet been found in Wisconsin. This
plant is native to Africa, Australia, and parts of Asia but was
introduced to Florida in 1960 via the aquarium trade. California
officials have also traced hydrilla infestations to shipments of
mail-order waterlilies. By the 1990s, hydrilla was well
established in southern and southwestern states where control and
management cost millions of dollars each year. During a ten-year
period, Florida spent $56 million dollars for hydrilla control,
but still the acreage of the plant doubled.
Hydrilla forms dense mats of vegetation that
interfere with recreation and destroy fish and wildlife habitat.
Besides the impact to recreational fishing, hydrilla greatly slows
water flow. Large mats of fragments can collect at culverts and
clog water control pumping stations. Because the plant can alter
water chemistry and oxygen levels, major infestations limit sport
fish weight and size.
Unlike other problem aquatic plants which
reproduce mainly by fragmentation, such as Eurasian watermilfoil,
hydrilla spreads by seeds, tubers, plant fragments, and turions.
Turions are compact "buds" produced along the leafy stems. They
break free of the parent plant and drift or settle to the bottom
to start new plants. They are 1/4 inch long, dark green, and
appear spiny. Tubers are underground and form at the end of roots.
They are small, potato-like, and are usually white or yellowish.
Hydrilla produces an abundance of tubers and turions in the fall.
One square meter of hydrilla can produce 5,000 tubers. Tubers may
remain dormant for several years in the sediment. Tubers and
turions can withstand ice cover, drying, herbicides, and ingestion
and regurgitation by waterfowl. Once hydrilla becomes established,
it is readily spread by waterfowl and boating activities.
Hydrilla closely resembles Elodea canadensis,
a native plant in Wisconsin. Hydrilla can be distinguished from
Elodea by the presence of tubers, leaves in whorls around the stem
(generally five leaves per whorl), serrations or small spines
along the leaf edges, and the reddish midrib of a fresh leaf.
Will hydrilla spread to Wisconsin waters? Although most
infestations are located in southern states, Wisconsin is not
exempt from the menace. Russia is currently battling this monster
at the 50o N latitude range, which is equivalent to the
US/Canadian border.
Prevent the Spread of Invasive Species
-
Never transplant water garden plants or release
animals into lakes, streams, wetlands or stormwater ponds.
-
Check the plants you buy for unwanted and
potentially invasive hitchhikers (seeds, plant fragments,
snails, insects, or fish),
-
Be aware of the regulations regarding
possession, transport and sale of invasive plants and animals.
-
Learn how invasive plants and animals spread
from lake to lake.
-
Recognize which plants and animals are
potentially invasive in Wisconsin.
-
Properly compost or dispose of unwanted plants
and animals.
For more information about invasive species,
visit this website:
http://dnr.wi.gov/invasives/
back to top
Heron Majesty
It was a wonderfully hot July day on Sawmill Lake
in Washburn County. I was paddling a sunny yellow kayak around the
shore of the small, wild lake. There were only two other craft out
there, carrying anglers, but they were out of sight around a
slight bend. The little cove on the southeast side was all mine.
Well, mine and the hundreds of bluegills staring up at me from
their home in the clear water. They were hiding under the cool
green shade of the water lily pads, whose brilliant white flowers
had called me over to that particular spot.
It was a slight movement of the otherwise still
great blue heron on the shoreline which dragged my attention from
the bluegills. As I watched, the heron hunted over the edge of the
water on its long legs, so slowly that its movements were almost
imperceptible to me. Its legs moved, and its head was up on a
straight neck. With no hurry, it moved its neck into an "S,"
lowering its head over the water. Meanwhile, the wind pushed my
kayak towards the heron. I hoped I wouldn’t scare it off before I
could see it catch a meal. But it was almost there…a couple more
seconds of this quiet posing, and…BAM! The heron’s head shot down,
and it came up with…nothing. Hrumph. All that anticipation (on my
part) and concentration (on the heron’s part). He flew off to a
different part of the lake to try again.
Great blue herons are common sight to many of us.
We see them feeding on our lakes, near marshes, and flying
overhead on giant wings. But what are they up to when they are out
of human sight? Where do they go when they leave Wisconsin for the
winter?
Great blue herons are the largest North American
members of a family which includes herons, egrets and bitterns.
While we often see them as individual hunters, they are not
solitary birds. Herons nest in large colonies, called a heronry or
a rookery. Nesting in numbers helps them ward off attacks from
predators such as raccoons, hawks, snakes, bald eagles and
opossums. In Wisconsin and most of the U.S., rookeries occur in
lofty trees. Real estate in treeless habitats include shrubs and
cacti.
In our corner of the world, great blues arrive to
their breeding grounds in early spring, males a few days ahead of
the females. The males work busily to build or repair a nest that
will be two to three feet wide. As no lumber yards are available,
twig stealing is common.
Herons’ courting rituals include stretching and
snapping necks, clattering bills, ruffling feathers, and slow
flying. Both males and females "dress up" for courting time. Their
normally yellow bills and greenish brown legs flush red, the skin
between their eyes and bills turns a lime green, and they sport
fresh plumage on their chests and backs.
Females lay two to five greenish-blue eggs in the
twig nests lined with soft material such as pine needles, grass or
moss. Incubation of the eggs lasts about a month, and males share
in the chore. Once hatched, both parents work to feed the young
birds for about two months. Despite the care, almost 70% of great
blues die in their first year. Smaller nestlings often starve or
are pushed from the nest and never make their first flight. Those
who are stronger and live to fly out on their own are
inexperienced hunters who fall prey to predators or human-placed
dangers such as fences and utility wires.
Those great blues who survive to adulthood grow to
be about 6.5 pounds and 4 feet tall with a wingspan of up to 6
feet! Henry David Thoreau once said, "When the heron takes to
flight, what a change in size and appearance! ...There go two
great undulating wings pinned together, but the body and neck must
have been left behind somewhere." Indeed, the large wings of the
heron outsize its body as they beat with a languid and unhurried
rhythm. While its size in the air is comparable to the sandhill
crane, the wingbeats are different. As another easy indicator, the
heron flies with its neck folded in an "S" while the crane’s neck
is straight. You might hear a distinctive "kraak" when the bird is
flying overhead. The heron, although a relatively quiet bird, also
emits a call when disturbed or greeting other herons.
Successful hunting of fish, frogs, salamanders,
snakes, crayfish, dragonflies, grasshoppers, and even small
mammals and birds is aided by keen eyesight, long legs and a 5-1/2
inch dagger-like bill.
Hunting is accomplished by two methods: "standing"
and "walking slowly." Prey caught using either of these methods is
swallowed immediately; if the prey is too big, the heron will kill
it by beating it on the ground and then pick it apart.
The cold winters in Wisconsin force the great
blues, like other birds, to migrate southward. Unlike the human
version of "snowbirds," birds migrate for a food source. Our great
blues, flying at an impressive 20-30 miles per hour, likely set
their sights on the lakes and marshes of southern states or Mexico
to spend the winter. They make this trip twice yearly, and it can
be for many years. The two oldest known great blues lived until 23
and 20 years, respectively.
While the population of great blue herons is
stable now, that was not always so. In the late 19th and early
20th centuries, birds with flamboyant plumage were shot for their
feathers, which decorated hats. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of
1918 put a stop to that practice and saved the great blue (and
many other species) from extinction. Today, their main threat is
human development. For a successful breeding season, nests need to
be located away from disturbances. While there are a few
established rookeries in more urban areas, they are anomalies.
More commonly, disturbances clear out a rookery. There are many
documented instances of a housing development or other human
disturbance forcing herons to find a new home. If this occurs
during nesting season, a generation of herons is lost.
Preserving rookery sites and consideration for a
healthy great blue population today will allow some person many
years in the future to kayak around a bend in the shoreline of a
small, wild lake and watch as a tall, majestic bird walks slowly
in pursuit of bluegills.
by Mary Pardee
UW-Extension Lakes Program
The photo of a heron
rookery was provided by Dr. Hays Cummins, Miami University.
See his Ohio Birds photo gallery at
http://jrscience.wcp.muohio.edu/birds/ohio_birds/toc.html
Great Blue
Heron
Graceful bird---sometimes silver, sometimes
blue,
I watch you in the evening light---standing alone.
Wading in the tall grass around the edges of your nesting place.
With eyes---quick, keen,
The lightning dart of your bill
Captures a wriggling minnow among the reeds.
Up in the dusky sky, your mate calls
"Skee, skee," as he flashes over the lake.
His waving plumes signal greetings---
And his arrival home.
Joanne Linden
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
back to top
Partners in Preservation: Saving Through Land Trusts
Have you ever thought about what will happen with
your lake property when you’re gone or what will happen to that
big hunk of shore that’s been owned by some organization or
individual for years? Wouldn’t it be nice if that big parcel of
land could be conserved - kept intact for its natural beauty, as a
home for wildlife, or just a positive place for your lake?
More and more landowners are turning to land
trusts to answer these questions.
What is a Land Trust?
A land trust is a nonprofit, non-governmental
conservation organization whose purpose is generally to work with
landowners to protect or preserve land. The largest and probably
most well-known land trust in the country is The Nature
Conservancy. Recently many smaller land trusts have formed in
Wisconsin to meet increasing demands for conservation at the local
level. Land trusts are one of the fastest growing conservation
movements in the country today.
There are more than 50 land trusts in the Badger
state. They range from small groups operated by volunteers to
large land trusts with professional staff. Typically a land trust
will choose to focus efforts on a specific geographic area or
region. Gathering Waters Conservancy, an umbrella organization for
Wisconsin land trusts, maintains an online directory of the land
trusts operating in Wisconsin and the areas they cover at
http://www.gatheringwaters.org.
What Does a Land Trust Do?
A land trust works with individual landowners,
communities, and lake and river associations interested in
permanently protecting land. Depending on the situation, there are
a variety of conservation options available. One of the most
common options is a land protection agreement (or conservation
easement), which is a legal agreement between the landowner and
the land trust that permanently protects land by limiting specific
things such as future uses, development, or subdivision of the
property.
That’s exactly what Willa Schmidt did when she
decided to preserve her land. She worked with the Northwoods Land
Trust (NWLT) to permanently conserve her 1,500 feet of natural
shoreline and 12 acres of woodlands on Snipe Lake, west of Eagle
River in Vilas County. "Willa Schmidt has left an incredible
legacy for the future," said NWLT Executive Director Bryan Pierce.
"By voluntarily placing permanent restrictions on her property,
she is ensuring that the conservation values of her property will
be protected long into the future."
"The land remains private land and is not removed
from the tax rolls," said Pierce. "The property can be sold or
passed on to heirs, but the easement restrictions remain in place.
The land trust holds these ‘development rights’ in perpetuity, and
takes on the job of annually monitoring the property and legally
enforcing the easement in the future, if necessary, to ensure that
the landowner’s conservation interests are carried out in
perpetuity."
Because each parcel of land and an owner’s vision
for that land are unique, each land protection agreement is unique
– the result of conversations and negotiations between the
landowner and land trust. With land protection agreements, the
landowner maintains ownership, but the land trust takes on the
responsibility for annually monitoring and enforcing the terms of
the agreement forever – even when that property gets sold or
passed on to other future owners. Because a land trust takes on
those legal responsibilities in perpetuity, they will usually tend
to focus on larger parcels having significant conservation value.
Small parcels, or those with a small amount of lake or river
frontage, may not always be the best ‘fit’ for land protection
agreements. However, there are other important ways small
landowners can contribute to lasting conservation options at a
local level.
Working in Partnership
Willa Schmidt’s property was one of the last
remaining large parcels of undeveloped shoreline on Snipe Lake.
Lake residents had long been interested in seeing that stretch of
shoreline stay natural, but without the monetary resources to
purchase the land outright, they knew there was a good chance it
would get sold and divided up into small parcels. In this case,
the Snipe Lake Association was able to work cooperatively with Ms.
Schmidt and the land trust to permanently protect the property.
"This is a great example of working cooperatively with the local
lake association," said Pierce. "The Snipe Lake Association
partnered with Schmidt and NWLT by contributing funds to help
cover the costs of the easement and the endowment needed to
annually monitor the easement and legally enforce it in the future
if necessary."
On Cloverleaf Lakes in Shawano County, lake
residents wanted to permanently protect a 25-acre island. They
formed a non-profit citizens group, and are working in partnership
with the town and the landowner (who donated part of the cost) to
purchase the island. The lake association donated funds and is
working hand-in-hand with the citizens group. With grants and
donations they will be able to buy the island and maintain it in a
natural state for the future generations to enjoy.
Are there Financial Benefits?
In addition to land protection easements, there
are a variety of other conservation options that landowners can
use to protect land including land donations, bargain sales,
registry programs, reserve life estates, and bequests in wills.
Depending on what option is used and the individual financial
situation of the landowner, there can be significant income tax,
estate tax, or even property tax advantages. Look for more
articles on preserving land through Lake Protection Grants, and
with other government agencies and organizations in future issues
of Lake Tides.
by Tiffany Lyden
UW-Extension Lakes Program
For more information on land trusts and
conservation options, visit
Gathering Waters Conservancy:
http://www.gatheringwaters.org
Land Trust Alliance:
http://www.lta.org
back to top
Volunteer Monitoring Update: The 2005 Great North American
Secchi Dip-In
Were you part of the Great North American Secchi
Dip-In this year? From June 25 until July 17, volunteers around
the world collected and reported water clarity data. The Dip-In
began in 1994 in six Midwestern states, including Wisconsin. It
has expanded in participation to almost 400 programs and 6,500
volunteers in all fifty states, three Canadian provinces, and six
other countries. A true demonstration of the power of volunteer
monitoring, Dip-In participants have created over 32,000 records
which are used to map regional differences and detect trends in
water clarity. Wisconsin’s Self-Help Lake Monitors are encouraged
to report their information at the Great North American Secchi
Dip-In website at
http://dipin.kent.edu/index.htm.
Some of you may be asking, "What in the world is a
‘secchi’ and why would anyone dip one?" Most volunteers use a
Secchi disk to measure water clarity. Water clarity is affected by
the color of the water and by particles of silt or clay or small
plants called algae, and therefore is a measure of some forms of
pollution. The disk itself, commonly colored black and white, is
named after a Jesuit priest who first used the disk more than 150
years ago. The disk is lowered into the water, and the depth at
which the black and white are no longer distinguishable is a
measure of the clarity of the water.
Consider taking part in future Great North
American Secchi Dip-Ins as an individual, lake organization or
community. Calling attention to this event can be an effective way
to generate interest and publicity for the quality of our lakes.
Various states have had governors, federal and state
representatives, and local officials participate in Secchi dipping
for water quality.
The Great North American Secchi Dip-In is
sponsored by Kent State University. You can find more
information about it at
http://dipin.kent.edu/index.htm.
by Michelle Washebeck
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
The Great North American Secchi Dip-In reports
some fun Secchi facts!
Deepest Recorded Secchi Depth
80 meters (262 feet) on October 13, 1986 in the
Weddell Sea, near Antarctica.
Smallest Secchi Depth
1-2 cm (0.4-0.8 inch) in Spirit Lake, Washington,
after the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The water of the lake was
colored black by the decaying trees in the lake.
Largest Secchi Disk
1.2 m (3.9 feet) in diameter
Smallest Secchi Disk
2 cm (0.8 inch) used to measure strength of coffee
back to top
New Study of Atrazine in Lakes
The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Trade and
Consumer Protection (DATCP), in conjunction with the DNR, is
initiating a survey of atrazine (a commonly used corn herbicide)
in Wisconsin lakes. In August, investigators will contact
self-help citizen monitors in a set of 100 lakes chosen to meet
certain geographic and size criteria to enlist their help in
collecting water samples for analysis. DATCP will use the results
of this survey to select lakes for a more detailed study in 2006,
as well as to determine if further monitoring for pesticides in
lakes is warranted. Please contact Paula Allen at DATCP (peallen@wisc.edu)
or Tim Asplund at DNR (tim.asplund@dnr.state.wi.us) for more
information. Stay tuned for more details and results in future
issues of Lake Tides, as well as at the Wisconsin Lakes
Convention!
back to top
One Fish...Two Fish...
What Fish? Who Fish?
Ever wanted to know the identity of a strange fish
you are seeing in your lake or catching on your line? The
UW-Center for Limnology, DNR, and Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute
have teamed up to offer the Fish Identification Database, a
resource for researching fish of Wisconsin. The database contains
a key that helps you to identify a fish, starting with simple
features like tail shape or number of spines. Multiple pictures of
each species and their distinguishing features assist in finding
an identifying name for your fish. Click on
http://www.wiscfish.org/fishid/ to begin using this easy and
fun database.
back to top
Calendar
August 18, 2005 – "Rain
As a Resource" Bus Tour, New Richmond. Visit
http://clean-water.uwex.edu for details.
August 24-25, 2005 –
Advanced Lake Leader Workshop, Long Lake, Shawano Co. Contact the
UWEX Lakes office at (715) 346-2116 for details.
August 27, 2005 – Rock
River Coalition Conference, Fort Atkinson High School. 8:30 am to
noon. Contact Suzanne Wade at Suzanne.wade@ces.uwex.edu for
details.
September 15, 2005 –
"Rain As a Resource" Bus Tour, Hudson. Visit
http://clean-water.uwex.edu for details.
October 21-22, 2005 -
2005 Citizen-based Monitoring Conference, Manitowish Waters – Lake
Jorn. Contact Erin Crain (608)-267-7479 or erin.crain@dnr.state.wi.us.
For more information see
http://atriweb.info/cbm
November 9-11, 2005 -
North American Lake Management Society Annual Meeting, Madison.
See
http://www.nalms.org for details.
back to top
Reflections
"The battle to restore a proper relationship
between man and his environment, between humans and other living
creatures, will require a long, sustained political, moral,
ethical and financial commitment far beyond any commitment ever
made by any society in history. Are we able? Yes. Are we willing?
That’s the unanswered question."
Earth Day 1970
Gaylord Nelson
1916-2005
back to top
Editors: Mary Pardee, Robert Korth,
Tiffany Lyden
Design Editor: Amy Kowalski
Contributing Editor: Carroll Schaal, DNR
Photos by: Robert Korth (unless
otherwise noted)
Illustrations by: Carol Watkins, Chris Whalen
The contents of Lake Tides
do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of UW-Extension,
UWSP-CNR, the Wisconsin DNR or the Wisconsin Association of Lakes.
Mention of trade names, commercial products, private businesses or
publicly financed programs does not constitute endorsement.
Lake Tides welcomes articles, letters or other news items for
publication. Articles in Lake Tides may be reprinted or
reproduced for further distribution with acknowledgment to the
Wisconsin Lakes Partnership. If you need this material in an
alternative format, please contact our office. No state tax
revenue supported the printing of this document.
|

We welcome you to use any of these articles for your
newsletter. Please credit the source.
Contact us at
uwexlakes@uwsp.edu if you have questions.
Back to Lake Tides
main page
|