|
Click here for a printable version
(PDF) of the Summer 2004 issue.
Lake
Tides - The
newsletter for people interested in Wisconsin Lakes
- a quarterly publication of the University
of Wisconsin-Extension Lakes Program - part of the
Wisconsin Lakes
Partnership.
Volume 29 No. 2 Spring 2004
Text-only version (HTML format)
Drugs & Water Don't Mix: A Pharmaceutical
Cocktail
Fassett's Locoweed: Pretty, Pink & Only in
Wisconsin
Westfield Middle School Adopts Twin Lakes
Wisconsin River of Words
The Earliest Riparians: Ancient Wisconsin
Lakes Uncovered
Governor Signs Bill Amending Lake District Law
Drugs &
Water Don't Mix: A Pharmaceutical Cocktail
Pharmaceuticals and personal care
products (PPCPs) are showing up in the aquatic environment. We
don’t enjoy being the bearer of unsettling news, but here is
another unintended consequence of our societal ways. If you listen
to NPR or CNN, read USA Today or follow reports from the United
States Geological survey (USGS) or the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), you may be aware of the growing concern
with PPCPs on aquatic ecosystems.
A Prescription Gumbo
Frogs, fish, and other aquatic critters and plants are being
exposed to a cocktail of pharmaceuticals and personal care
products in amounts that can disrupt their normal functions. The
list of compounds being found in our steams is impressive: human
and veterinary antibiotics, antidepressants, cardiovasculars,
caffeine, biogenics and respiratory drugs are leading the way.
These PPCPs have been found in almost every place they have been
looked for. According to Herb Buxton, with USGS in Washington DC,
a study "tested waters across the nation for 95 chemicals ranging
from perfumes to antidepressants. Of 139 streams tested, 80% had
at least one of the chemicals and 50% had seven or more." Buxton
added, "Some of these chemicals can be active at very low levels,
but they will most likely be found in areas with large or
concentrated human or animal populations."
A Medicated Nation
An aging population and a host of new and helpful drugs that
started showing up in the late 80s and 90s have caused drug sales
to rocket upward. In the past 20 years we have made great strides
in the medicated control of diseases like AIDs, Alzheimers, high
blood pressure, high cholesterol and many more. Sales of
cholesterol lowering drugs called statins were at $1.8 billion in
1991. By 2000 those sales had increased to $17.8 billion. With the
introduction of a host of new anti-depression drugs in the late
80s, antidepressant prescriptions grew from 40 million in 1988 to
more than 120 million in 1998. According to the National Center
for Health Statistics at the Center for Disease Control, more than
61 million prescriptions for antidepressant were given by U.S.
doctors in 2001. Prescription drug sales in the U.S. have
increased by 16.9% to $172 billion last year, plus $18 billon in
over-the-counter medicines.
When we take medication, our bodies excrete the active
chemicals with as much as 90% of the ingested drug still in a
potent form. Sewage treatment plants are not designed to remove
many synthetics of these chemicals in the water. Farm animals are
also given drugs to make them grow faster and become more fertile.
Much of this ends up in our ground and surface waters. The Union
of Concerned Scientists estimates that 25 million pounds of
antibiotics are fed to animals each year compared to 8 million
pounds for people.
Fish on Prozac
Bryan Brooks, a toxicologist at Baylor University, found
evidence of the antidepressants Prozac in the brains, livers and
muscles of bluegills caught downstream from the Pecan Creek Water
Reclamation Plant near Dallas, Texas. Marsha Black, an aquatic
toxicologist at the University of Georgia in Athens, told Lake
Tides, "with levels of antidepressants as low as 1.5 parts per
billion, African frog metamorphosis was delayed from a normal of
70 days to as much as 100 days." Dr. Black found that common
antidepressant such as Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil also caused
development problems in fish. Researchers at the University
of Kansas found antibiotics eliminated some algae species from
stream communities. Hair dye and spermicides halved the number of
algae types and reduced overall volume of algae by more than three
quarters. Another of the dominant concerns for scientists has to
do with possible hormonal disruption in fish by natural and
man-made estrogen. In addition, the release of antibiotics could
lead to more drug resistant pathogens.
Doom and Gloom?
At this time researchers don’t believe PPCPs are a major threat
to humans but they may pose a grave threat to our aquatic
ecosystems. Many of these drugs have half lives of a few weeks in
the environment but the continued flood of drugs may create a
concentration high enough to cause trouble. There is also concern
over what all these different drugs and chemicals may do as they
mix together in unknown ways. Elisabeth Harrahy, a WDNR Water
Quality Standards Specialist, sees PPCPs in our environment as a
significant emerging concern even though there has not been much
research on the problem in Wisconsin.
What Can We Do?
Harrahy suggests that we use medication only if we need to and
that we are careful with what we do with out-of-date prescriptions
(such as not flushing them down the drain). As consumers we can be
more aware of placing drugs and perfumes in the environment. We
can ask to purchase meat that has not been subjected to growth
hormones. To promote better control of PPCPs and to facilitate and
partially coordinate international research on the many issues
involved with them as trace environmental pollutants, the EPA
maintains a website devoted to the issue, called the Green
Pharmacy. The pharmaceutical industry is also looking at ways to
limit drugs in the environment by minimizing waste, recycling and
better controlling the process from development to production and
on to their final use.
Growth in pharmaceutical drug sales has posted double digit
increases each year since 1995. While pharmaceutical drugs have
benefited humans and animals with healthier and longer lives, this
is a story of the residue of our society and how it impacts the
natural world. Sometimes our attempts to make the planet a place
where humans can live better lives has unintended consequences.
For more information, visit:
www.epa.gov/esd/chemistry/pharma/about.htm
http://toxics.usgs.gov/regional/emc.html
back to top
Fassett's
Locoweed: Pretty in Pink & Only in Wisconsin
It was a warm sunny day in late May, and
I was driving along Highway 73 from Plainfield to Wautoma, a route
I travel often. There is a small yellow sign there for a State
Natural Area near Plainfield Lake. I had seen this sign often but
had never stopped; on this day I decided to pull off the highway
to see what this natural area was all about. Parking my car, I
headed along a path to the small lake. I rounded a corner and
there in front of me, sweeping along the shoreline, was a soft sea
of pink. I looked to the left and to the right and saw pink
flowers stretching along the entire north side of the lake. The
band of flowers was wide - up to 20 feet in some places. As I got
closer I realized the area was buzzing with busy bumblebees
gathering pollen. Leaning down to take a closer look, I found pea
plant-like flowers and pea plant-like leaves strung along the
stem. It was a plant I had never seen before and I wondered, is
this prolific flower a "good" plant or a "bad" plant? At the time,
I did not realize that I was one of the few and lucky people that
have ever seen this rare beauty.
Fassett’s Locoweed is a member of the legume (bean) family. It
is a rare plant to see and it is becoming more rare. Wisconsin is
the only place in the world that it can be found. Because of its
rarity, it is listed by the federal government as threatened, and
by the state of Wisconsin as endangered.
The plant was first discovered in Wisconsin in 1928. Years
later plants were discovered at other locations by one of
Wisconsin’s most famous field botanists, Norman Fassett, known to
many lake folks for his Manual of Aquatic Plants. In honor of
Fassett’s contribution to the knowledge of the state’s flora, the
plant is named after him. Its Latin name, Oxytopis campestris,
describes its features: Oxytropis breaks down into oxus,
meaning sharp, and tropis, meaning keel, in reference to
the beaked flower petals. Campestris means "of the fields
or open plains." O. campestris var. chartacea is one of the
famous locoweeds which contain alkaloid compounds known for
causing cattle to behave in unusual ways.
Peas, Purple and Pink
When fully grown, Fassett’s Locoweed is only 4 to 12 inches
tall. Its pea-shaped flowers are purplish-pink, and are only 1/2
to 3/4 inch across. They are arranged on a spike in groups of
about 15, and start flowering from the bottom of the spike.
Locoweed begins flowering the second or third week of May and
continues through mid-June. The flowers are frequented by bees who
use their legs to pry open the flower to get the pollen that’s
inside. The entire plant, including the leaves, is covered with
white silky hairs that help to keep the plant cool under the hot
sun. The leaves are from 3 to 8 inches long, each with nine to
fifteen pairs of leaflets.
It is believed that this plant only reproduces by seed. After
flowering, the flowers shrivel and small yellow seedpods appear.
These seedpods contain many small black seeds. The specific
conditions that these seeds need for successful germination is not
yet known.
Good to Grow
Fassett’s Locoweed is presently found in three counties
(Bayfield, Waushara, and Portage) at seven sites. It grows along
the sandy and gravelly shorelines of landlocked, hard water lakes.
The distribution of this plant throughout the state may be related
to the glacial history of Wisconsin. Nearly all of the lakes with
historical populations are small, less than 36 acres in size and
occur at approximately 1100 foot elevation. These lakes are
generally shallow and dependent upon groundwater seepage for their
water supply. One of the most important characteristics of the
lakes where Fassett’s Locoweed is found is their fluctuating water
levels. The changing water levels help to keep shrubs and grasses
from crowding out or shading out the locoweed.
This plant is rare largely because it requires a very specific
habitat. Fassett’s Locoweed populations are declining because of
habitat loss and destruction through development of homes and
high-impact shoreline activities like ATV travel, trampling,
herbicides and pesticides, over irrigation, and loss of woodland.
An emerging (and perhaps the greatest long-term) threat is the
introduction of non-native weedy species such as spotted knapweed
(Centaurea biebersteinii) and sweet clover (Melilotus
ssp.), which could essentially "take over" locoweed habitat.
Why should we care?
If we believe this plant has the right to exist, it is
important to protect it and all other rare and not-so rare plants.
They are a part of the state’s biological diversity. By
definition, biological diversity is the number and abundance of
species found within a common environment such as a forest, a
lake, or even your backyard. This diversity includes every living
thing from top to bottom…from the microorganisms in the soil under
our feet to the towering trees whose shade we stand in.
All of our natural systems are interconnected and
interdependent in a tapestry of life, beautiful threads woven
together in unknown ways. If one thread is taken away, the entire
tapestry begins to fray and may completely unravel.
How can I help?
The key to protecting Fassett’s Locoweed is to protect it’s
habitat from destruction and overuse. Though it can tolerate some
disturbance, repeated foot or recreational vehicle travel can be
detrimental to the plant. Pesticide use as well as mowing and
grazing should be restricted in the immediate area where Fassett’s
grows. Property owners on whose land Fassett’s Locoweed grows can
help by keeping track of plant numbers and health. They can also
help manage to maintain the appropriate habitat by fencing
populations or removing invading, non-native species. Most
important is to learn how to identify the plant and to learn more
about the plant so that in turn you may gain an appreciation for
its uniqueness.
By Darcy Kind
WI Dept. of Natural Resources
Know More
Want to know more about Fassett’s Locoweed, or think you might
know of a population? Contact Darcy Kind with the DNR’s Landowner
Contact Program at (608)267-9789. This program, based out of the
Endangered Resources Program, is currently working with private
landowners to help foster appreciation for locoweed and other very
rare plants throughout the state. Through the program, private
landowners throughout Wisconsin are acting as guardians of rare
plants and their sensitive habitats, by voluntarily agreeing to
protect and monitor the plants. See the Landowner Contact Program
website at:
www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/er/landowner/
back to top
Westfield Middle School Adopts Twin Lakes
Earlier this year, Westfield Middle School teamed up with the
Twin Lakes Conservancy (Marquette County) to build a program of
lake study for 7th and 8th
graders. This Adopt-A-Lake (AAL) project has grown…
Quinn Shirley, middle school science teacher, and Don O’Keene,
a graduate of the Lake Leaders Institute, met to discuss the goals
of their Adopt-A-Lake project. With a little work, they were able
to plan a program that utilized the school’s Earth Sciences
textbook as well as met the needs of the school’s math and science
curriculum and the teachers’ goals for the year. They planned
one-day sessions that would introduce students to important
concepts within the watershed. Over 200 students will take part in
the Twin Lakes Conservancy AAL project.
Topics including topography, glaciation and stratification, and
the watershed of Twin Lakes have been closely looked at by the
students through hands-on presentations and activities. The recent
discovery of petroforms created by ancient people has sparked the
students' interest in preserving the area, being outdoors, and
making a difference in their lake community.
Adopt-A-Lake is an environmental education program that
provides resources and recognition to lake organizations and
schools or youth groups that team up on lake stewardship efforts.
Contact the UWEX-Lakes office at (715) 346-2116 or uwexlakes@uwsp.edu
for more information.
back to top
Wisconsin River of Words
Wisconsin River of Words is an environmental art and poetry
program focusing on watersheds. Students in grades K-12 are
encouraged to get outdoors to learn about and enjoy their home
watershed, then unleash their imaginations.
Resulting poetry and artwork can be sent to the national River
of Words competition, which judges in four age categories. All
Wisconsin entries sent to the national competition are also judged
in a Wisconsin-wide contest. The 2004 competition yielded over
20,000 entries. Wisconsin students made up 450 of these,
including Joanna Foster who is a national finalist in poetry
for Grades 10-12. For a list of Wisconsin River of Words poetry
and art winners, go to our website at www.uwsp.edu/cnr/uwexlakes.
back to top
The Earliest
Riparians: Ancient Wisconsin Lakes
Uncovered
Imagine living on a lakeshore…not
because you chose to live there for economic or recreational
reasons, but because that is where you were born. Visualize a
waterfront community where your neighbors live together in large
groups instead of homes evenly spaced around the water body.
Imagine having no concept of actually "owning" property.
Envision large meetings, similar to
lake meetings, where the sole undertaking is to build boats. You
build these boats using hand axes which you chipped from stone.
Couple these images with the knowledge that your survival is
vitally dependant on your natural environment and that same
unpredictable setting can just as easily take it all away. The
mental picture portrayed above is a likely representation of life
for early Wisconsinites some 11,000 years B.P. (Before Present).
This story starts with highway construction in Door County. The
Wisconsin Department of Transportation was in the process of an
expansion project on State Highway 57 when six archeological sites
were found in the project’s right-of-way. Dr. David Overstreet,
director of the Center for Archaeology Research at Marquette
University in Milwaukee, and Jim Clark, a researcher there, are
the principal investigators of one of the archeological sites
called the Fabry Creek complex. According to Clark, "the lake
waters at the time were very different. It was a time when
shorelines’ rise and fall was influenced by the melting and
freezing of glaciers."
Since Dr. Overstreet’s discovery of a Paleo-Indian site near
Pleasant Prairie in Kenosha County, Wisconsin in 1987, he has been
piecing together the early human history of the upper Great Lakes.
Along with Overstreet and Clark, the UW-Milwaukee Archaeological
Research Laboratory, Dr. Bill Mode at UW-Oshkosh, various students
and other specialists have also been participating in the
excavation and investigation processes. Ironically, if it were not
for the State Highway 57 expansion project, there would have been
no archeological excavations taking place at these sites. Tools
found with mammoth bones in Southeastern Wisconsin dating between
13,000 and 14,000 years B.P. link with tools found at the Door
County site and may place people in the Great Lakes area much
earlier than previously believed.
Dr. Overstreet believes, "These early people developed
sophisticated scavenging, hunting and boat building strategies to
deal with their fluctuating environment…regardless of which
(ancient) lake level you want to talk about, it would have flooded
a tremendous amount of the landscape. Within 200 years, the
glaciers advanced southwest across Wisconsin only to abruptly
recede back beyond Michigan’s Mackinaw Island, producing
unpredictable environments of flooding, droughts and ice. There
certainly is good evidence to indicate that these
landscape-dependent people were actively involved in building
canoes in order to traverse from one inclusive environment to
another during times of flooding."
These Door County findings are significant because they place
people in the Green Bay peninsula area as far back as 11,000 to
14,000 B.P. (actual dates are still pending). This time period
correlates with Dr. Overstreet’s hypothesis that indigenous people
were exploiting the tundra and tundra-like environments that were
exposed as the ice sheets retreated. This hypothesis implies that
people were following the retreat of the glaciers. "These sites
are contributing proof that people were living at the margins of
the retreating ice sheets, hunting woolly mammoths and bison as
they followed the advancing and retreating glaciers across the
state," Overstreet said. They probably used boats to move about
these ancient lakes. This idea is strengthened by discoveries of a
woodworking tool (called an adze) possibly used for boat building.
At least three major lakes present in Wisconsin’s glacial past
were predecessors of today’s inland lakes: Lake Oshkosh (slightly
older than 11,000 years), Lake Algonquin (ca. 11,000 years old)
and Lake Nipissing (ca. 4,000- 5,000 years old). These lakes were
also the precursors to the Great Lakes, and were carved out of the
landscape by glaciers and filled with melting glacial water from
the retreating ice sheets. The recent lake sediments unearthed at
the site near Fabry Creek will be an indicator of which lakes were
actually present. Dr. Overstreet and Clark collected radiocarbon
samples from artifacts found at Fabry Creek and the data obtained
should help to settle the questions pertaining to age. In
addition, Dr. Mode also collected samples for pollen analysis. The
results indicate that the shoreline sediments at the Fabry Creek
site are probably not of Lake Nipissing age, but more likely that
of Lake Algonquin or Lake Oshkosh. Further work to discover the
true age is still ongoing.
Tales of early humans on our lakes are fascinating…and there
may also be a lesson to learn. The first humans to live near these
lakes 420 generations ago probably viewed themselves as "a part
of" the natural world, not "apart from" the natural world. How
will families 420 generations from now remember us?
By Andrew Walloch
UW-Stevens Point Natural Resources Student and UWEX Lakes
Assistant
back to top
Governor Signs Bill Amending Lake District Law
It has been years since Chapter 33 (the laws governing public
inland lake protection and rehabilitation districts) has been
changed. At this year's Wisconsin Lakes Convention, Governor Doyle
signed into law SB 440, now Wisconsin Act 275, clarifying some
issues facing the state’s lake management districts and amending
Chapter 33. Here is a list of some of these changes:
� Removes one of the conditions that a county board
needed to consider in the formation of a district. That condition
was that the establishment of the district would not contribute to
long-term pollution.
� Specifies that no absentee ballots or proxies are
permitted at annual meetings.
� Limits the amount of special charges for services
provided to members of a lake district to not more than $2.50 per
$1000 of assessed valuation.
� Allows the electors and property owners at the
annual meeting to consider and vote on amendments to the annual
budget.
� Requires the secretary of the board of
commissioners to prepare and send notices of the annual meeting,
any special meeting, and meeting of the board.
� Requires specific content in the proposed annual
budget to be presented for debate and adoption at a district’s
annual meeting.
� Adds to the duties of the board of
commissioner of the lake districts the scheduling of the districts
annual meeting and the preparation of the annual budget for
presentation at the annual meeting.
� Requires the proposed annual budget to include a
list of existing debt and expected revenue and expenditures from
the previous year and estimated revenues and expenditures for the
current year.
The bill (not as part of chapter 33) also allows the DNR to
enter into contracts with public and private persons to create and
support a statewide lake monitoring network and data base. For
more details on the changes to Chapter 33 go to www.uwsp.edu/cnr/uwexlakes.
Look for more details on the changes to Chapter 33 in future
issues of Lake Tides.
back to top
Editors: Mary Pardee, Robert Korth,
Tiffany Lyden
Design Editor: Amy Kowalski
Contributing Editor: Carroll Schaal, DNR
Photos by: Robert Korth (unless
otherwise noted)
Illustrations by: Carol Watkins, Chris Whalen
The contents of Lake Tides
do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of UW-Extension,
UWSP-CNR, the Wisconsin DNR or the Wisconsin Association of Lakes.
Mention of trade names, commercial products, private businesses or
publicly financed programs does not constitute endorsement.
Lake Tides welcomes articles, letters or other news items for
publication. Articles in Lake Tides may be reprinted or
reproduced for further distribution with acknowledgment to the
Wisconsin Lakes Partnership. If you need this material in an
alternative format, please contact our office. No state tax
revenue supported the printing of this document.
|