|
|||||||||||
|
|
Status of Comprehensive Planning and Educational Needs in Wisconsin By Rebecca Roberts In May 2006, the UW-Extension Community Planning and Plan Implementation Team conducted a survey of Extension professionals to learn more about comprehensive planning efforts throughout the state. The survey attempted to gauge the current status of comprehensive planning efforts in Wisconsin communities, understand UW-Extension�s involvement in those efforts, and identify challenges and educational needs faced by communities that have not started a planning process. This article highlights some of the findings from the survey. The full report is available online at: www.uwsp.edu/cnr/landcenter/pubs-other.html. Status of County Comprehensive Planning Efforts The
map ( When asked about factors hindering local planning efforts, lack of financial and staff resources were rated most highly. Lack of political support and property rights concerns were also highly rated. Extension professionals did not feel that a lack of educational resources related to comprehensive planning was a factor. Educational Needs Although educational materials were not rated as a factor hindering local planning processes, survey respondents did weigh in on what additional educational resources they would like to see created or improved. As communities move forward in their planning processes, their educational needs have changed. While early materials, such as those that considered how to prepare for a planning process or hire a planning consultant were once urgent, communities are now focusing more on tangible products such as data, maps and ideas to implement their plans. Education related to plan implementation strategies and model or exemplary plan examples were the most highly-rated educational needs. Authors and Acknowledgements This survey was developed as a joint effort of the UW-Extension Community Planning and Plan Implementation team. The survey instrument was created by team members Eric Olson, Rebecca Roberts, Douglas Miskowiak and Patrick Nehring. The survey report and analyses were generated by Rebecca Roberts. The map was created by Douglas Miskowiak. Many thanks to Mary Lucas who assisted with survey design and administration.
|
||||||||||