Picture (435x227, 55Kb)  

Volume 4, Issue 2

  Fall 2004
 Center for Land Use Education
The Land Use Tracker
   

 

PREVIOUS ARTICLE | FRONT PAGE | NEXT ARTICLE

 

Considering Noise Impacts of Transportation Facilities

By Barbara Feeney, AICP, Transportation Planner
Wisconsin Department of Transportation

According to a publication of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the most pervasive sources of noise in our environment are noises associated with transportation. Noise is generally defined as �unwanted sound,� and it has documented effects on human health, such as raising blood pressure and heart rate. The degree of physical stress caused by noise is related to the level of loudness, duration and frequency of the noise. It is difficult to generalize about the impacts of highway noise.

However, it is generally correct to say that highway noise is a source of irritation to those that are exposed to it on an on-going basis. Aside from societal and health impacts, another practical reason to consider noise impacts relates to property values. If noise impacts are not anticipated and actions taken to minimize them, properties located near roads may lose their value over time as traffic levels rise.

Useful Definitions and Measurements

The physics of noise measurement are complex, but there are a few basic definitions and relationships worth knowing:

Sound pressure levels are measured in terms of decibels (dB), and the sound pressure levels of most commonly heard sounds range from 0 to 140 dB.
The A-weighted sound measurement scale (dBA) approximates the way sound is heard by people. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of sound in a manner similar to the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise.
The smallest perceptible change in noise levels is 3 dBA. An increase in 10 dBA will sound twice as loud to the average listener. Thus, a decrease of 10 dBA will sound half as loud.
The dominant noise produced by autos is the tire-road interaction, since properly-tuned car engines are relatively quiet. Trucks produce noise levels that are about 15 dBA higher than autos, with engine-related noises dominating, especially during acceleration. Table 1 shows the relative level of transportation noises in comparison to other common community noises.
On average, community members respond with widespread complaints to an increase in noise levels of 10 dBA. Table 2 shows expected community responses to noise level changes.

Table 1:  Comparison of Common Noise Levels

Noise Source and Distance

A-weighted sound level in decibels (dBA)

Characterization 2

130

Threshold of pain

Jet aircraft takeoff, 200 ft 1

120

Possible building damage

Commercial fireworks, 1,500 ft 2

115

Threshold for immediate permanent hearing damage

Emergency vehicle siren, 50 ft 2

105

Shotgun, 200 ft 3

100

Locomotive horn, 100 ft 2

95

Extremely noisy

Bulldozer, 50 ft 2

90

Jet ski, 20 ft 2

85

Very noisy

Boat, 50 ft 3

80

Off-road vehicle, 50 ft 3

70

Noisy

Freeway, 100 ft 1

70

Industrial ambient noise level 3

65

Moderately noisy

Urban ambient noise level 2

60

Light traffic, 100 ft 1

50

Suburban ambient noise level 2

50

Rural ambient noise level 2

45

Quiet

Wind turbine, 1,000 ft 4

40

Soft whisper, 2 ft 3

30

Very quiet

0

Threshold of hearing

 

Table 2:  Community Response to Increased Noise Levels 5

Change (dBA)

Category

Description

0

None

No observed reaction

5

Little

Sporadic complaints

10

Medium

Widespread complaints

15

Strong

Threats of community action

20

Very Strong

Vigorous community action

 


Minimizing Transportation-Related Noise Impacts

Because there are limits to how much can be done to eliminate noise emanating from vehicles, it is important that local governments use their authority to mitigate noise impacts at the point where sound is received.

There are three principal ways to minimize noise impacts on humans:

1. Regulating the proximity of noise-sensitive uses to noise sources such as highways and airports.
2. Using site design, building layout and construction techniques to minimize sound impacts.
3. Planning for noise barriers in the form of berms or vegetation.

Regulating the Proximity of Developed Uses to Highways and Airports

A seemingly obvious way to prevent noise impacts is to locate highway facilities away from developed areas. Unfortunately there are some undesirable consequences associated with this approach. First, highway users from the developed area are required to drive farther to access the highway. Development also tends to grow towards the highway facility because of the access benefits it offers. This can result in more open lands being consumed by development than is otherwise needed to accommodate growth. For these reasons, new highway facilities (such as bypasses) are often located relatively close to the edges of communities.

Local zoning regulations play an essential role in preventing noise-sensitive uses from locating near busy arterials and highways. In general, land uses to avoid placing near high traffic roads include residences, schools, churches, day care centers and hospitals. While some advocate placing open space uses between highways and adjacent land uses to act as a buffer zone, this practice is only appropriate if the open space is not intended for recreational use.

Uses which are less noise sensitive and may be appropriate near busy roads include commercial, office, and industrial. Unfortunately, there is often not enough demand for noise-compatible land uses to allow all areas near high volume roads to be zoned for these uses. In this case, communities may decide to permit residential or institutional uses with special requirements for noise barriers, noise sensitive building layouts and special acoustical treatments.

Using Site Design, Building Layout and Construction Techniques

In the event that developed uses will be permitted near highways, there are some techniques available to help reduce noise impacts. Walls facing the highway should be well-insulated and constructed of noise-absorbing materials. Additional wall thickness and special efforts to seal windows can assist to some extent.

When considering site design and layout, open space facilities intended for recreational use should be located on the side of the building farthest from the highway. If residential uses are involved, patios and balconies should be placed on the side of the building opposite the highway.

The layout of interior spaces can also be planned to protect against noise impacts. However, these opportunities are limited, especially for residential uses.

Providing Noise Barriers

Federal Highway Administration regulations do not permit the use of federal funds for the construction of noise barriers in areas near existing highways. Therefore, it is up to local communities to plan to prevent noise impacts.

New developments are often required to include sound walls or berms adjacent to highways. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) publication, The Audible Landscape, suggests that earthen berms can provide noise reduction of up to 15 dBA. Due to considerable cost and size requirements, however, earthen berms may only be practical in cases where a large development can financially absorb the costs.

The effectiveness of vegetation in mitigating sound impacts has been the subject of some debate. A 1971 publication by David I. Cook and David Haverbeke, Trees and Shrubs for Noise Abatement, recommends planting 20 to 50-foot wide belts of trees and shrubs, located 20 to 50 feet from the center of the nearest traffic lane. This may be helpful in urban areas where the main source of noise is the tire-road interaction, but it is less helpful if truck noise predominates. Along high-speed rural facilities, 65 to 100-foot wide belts of trees and shrubs are recommended. Evergreen varieties are recommended where year-round screening is desired.

Another option is to erect manmade noise barriers. This is a costly solution and is only practical when the property developer expects that the market for the land near the highway will bring high enough prices to cover the costs of erecting the barrier.

Summary

A multi-pronged approach is needed to address the impacts that traffic noise can have on a community. A comprehensive plan that includes a long term vision for the location or expansion of multi-lane arterials is essential to plan for community noise impacts. In general, the plan should identify the probable need for new or expanded roads and minimize the placement of noise sensitive uses near those locations, especially if truck traffic is expected. An approach commonly used by communities to determine which uses should or should not be permitted adjacent to a road involves determining the expected future level of traffic on a road and comparing that to existing roads carrying similar volumes and types of traffic. When the placement of noise sensitive uses near noise sources cannot be completely avoided, local zoning and subdivision regulations should include special provisions to minimize noise impacts. A combination of site design, building layout, acoustical techniques and noise barriers, as described in this article, are appropriate.

 

This article has been reviewed for form and content by Rebecca Roberts of the Center for Land Use Education. Any errors, mistakes and omissions remain the responsibility of the author.

 

Data Sources:

1 Peterson, A.P.G. and Gross, Jr., E. E. (1974). Handbook of Noise Measurement. General Radio, (7th ed.) Concord, MA.

2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Final Environmental Impact Statement, Chapter 3.06. Available online: www.ttsfo.com/sbcteis/feis/text/03_06.pdf.

3 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. (2001). Threshold Evaluation Report, Chapter 9: Noise. Available online: www.trpa.org/documents/Threshold_Eval_2001/9-NOIS%20FINAL.pdf.

4 Danish Wind Industry Association. Sounds from Wind Turbines. Available online: www.windpower.org/en/tour/env/sound.htm.

5 International Standards Organization. (November 1969). Noise Assessment with Respect to Community Responses. ISO/TC 43. New York: United Nations.

PREVIOUS ARTICLE | FRONT PAGE | NEXT ARTICLE