|
|
PREVIOUS
ARTICLE |
FRONT PAGE |
NEXT ARTICLE
Considering
Noise
Impacts
of
Transportation
Facilities
By Barbara Feeney, AICP, Transportation Planner
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
According to a publication of the
U.S. Department of Transportation, the most pervasive sources of noise
in our environment are noises associated with transportation. Noise is
generally defined as �unwanted sound,� and it has documented effects
on human health, such as raising blood pressure and heart rate. The
degree of physical stress caused by noise is related to the level of
loudness, duration and frequency of the noise. It is difficult to
generalize about the impacts of highway noise.
However, it is generally correct to say that
highway noise is a source of irritation to those that are exposed to it on
an on-going basis. Aside from societal and health impacts, another
practical reason to consider noise impacts relates to property values. If
noise impacts are not anticipated and actions taken to minimize them,
properties located near roads may lose their value over time as traffic
levels rise.
Useful Definitions
and Measurements
The physics of noise measurement are complex, but there are a few
basic definitions and relationships worth knowing:
�
Sound pressure levels are measured in terms of
decibels (dB), and the sound pressure levels of most commonly
heard sounds range from 0 to 140 dB.
� The A-weighted sound measurement scale
(dBA) approximates the way sound is heard by people. The
A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency
components of sound in a manner similar to the human ear and
correlates well with subjective reactions to noise.
� The smallest perceptible change in
noise levels is 3 dBA. An increase in 10 dBA will
sound twice as loud to the average listener. Thus, a decrease of 10
dBA will sound half as loud.
� The dominant noise produced by autos is
the tire-road interaction, since properly-tuned car engines are
relatively quiet. Trucks produce noise levels that are about 15 dBA
higher than autos, with engine-related noises dominating, especially
during acceleration. Table 1 shows the relative level of
transportation noises in comparison to other common community noises.
� On average, community members respond
with widespread complaints to an increase in noise levels of 10 dBA.
Table 2 shows expected community responses to noise level
changes.
|
Table 1: Comparison of Common
Noise Levels |
|
Noise Source and Distance |
A-weighted sound level in decibels (dBA) |
Characterization 2 |
|
130 |
Threshold of pain |
|
Jet aircraft takeoff, 200 ft 1 |
120 |
Possible building damage |
|
Commercial fireworks, 1,500 ft 2 |
115 |
Threshold for immediate permanent hearing damage |
|
Emergency vehicle siren, 50 ft 2 |
105 |
|
|
Shotgun, 200 ft 3 |
100 |
|
|
Locomotive horn, 100 ft 2 |
95 |
Extremely noisy |
|
Bulldozer, 50 ft 2 |
90 |
|
|
Jet ski, 20 ft 2 |
85 |
Very noisy |
|
Boat, 50 ft 3 |
80 |
|
|
Off-road vehicle, 50 ft 3 |
70 |
Noisy |
|
Freeway, 100 ft 1 |
70 |
|
|
Industrial ambient noise level 3 |
65 |
Moderately noisy |
|
Urban ambient noise level 2 |
60 |
|
|
Light traffic, 100 ft 1 |
50 |
|
|
Suburban ambient noise level 2 |
50 |
|
|
Rural ambient noise level 2 |
45 |
Quiet |
|
Wind turbine, 1,000 ft 4 |
40 |
|
|
Soft whisper, 2 ft 3 |
30 |
Very quiet |
|
0 |
Threshold of hearing |
|
Table 2: Community Response
to Increased Noise Levels 5 |
|
Change (dBA) |
Category |
Description |
|
0 |
None |
No observed reaction |
|
5 |
Little |
Sporadic complaints |
|
10 |
Medium |
Widespread complaints |
|
15 |
Strong |
Threats of community action |
|
20 |
Very Strong |
Vigorous community action |
|
Minimizing
Transportation-Related Noise Impacts
Because there are limits to how much can be done to eliminate noise
emanating from vehicles, it is important that local governments use their
authority to mitigate noise impacts at the point where sound is received.
There are three principal ways to minimize noise impacts on humans:
1. Regulating the proximity of noise-sensitive uses to noise sources
such as highways and airports.
2. Using site design, building layout and construction techniques to
minimize sound impacts.
3. Planning for noise barriers in the form of berms or vegetation.
Regulating the Proximity of
Developed Uses to Highways and Airports
A seemingly obvious way to prevent noise impacts is to locate highway
facilities away from developed areas. Unfortunately there are some
undesirable consequences associated with this approach. First, highway
users from the developed area are required to drive farther to access the
highway. Development also tends to grow towards the highway facility
because of the access benefits it offers. This can result in more open
lands being consumed by development than is otherwise needed to
accommodate growth. For these reasons, new highway facilities (such as
bypasses) are often located relatively close to the edges of communities.
Local zoning regulations play an essential role in preventing
noise-sensitive uses from locating near busy arterials and highways. In
general, land uses to avoid placing near high traffic roads include
residences, schools, churches, day care centers and hospitals. While some
advocate placing open space uses between highways and adjacent land uses
to act as a buffer zone, this practice is only appropriate if the open
space is not intended for recreational use.Uses
which are less noise sensitive and may be appropriate near busy roads
include commercial, office, and industrial. Unfortunately, there is
often not enough demand for noise-compatible land uses to allow all
areas near high volume roads to be zoned for these uses. In this case,
communities may decide to permit residential or institutional uses
with special requirements for noise barriers, noise sensitive building
layouts and special acoustical treatments.
Using Site Design, Building
Layout and Construction Techniques
In the event that developed uses will be permitted near highways,
there are some techniques available to help reduce noise impacts. Walls
facing the highway should be well-insulated and constructed of
noise-absorbing materials. Additional wall thickness and special efforts
to seal windows can assist to some extent.
When considering site design and layout, open space facilities
intended for recreational use should be located on the side of the
building farthest from the highway. If residential uses are involved,
patios and balconies should be placed on the side of the building opposite
the highway.
The layout of interior spaces can also be planned to protect against
noise impacts. However, these opportunities are limited, especially for
residential uses.
Providing Noise Barriers
Federal Highway Administration regulations do not permit the use of
federal funds for the construction of noise barriers in areas near
existing highways. Therefore, it is up to local communities to plan to
prevent noise impacts.
New developments are often required to
include sound walls or berms adjacent to highways. The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) publication, The Audible Landscape,
suggests that earthen berms can provide noise reduction of up to 15
dBA. Due to considerable cost and size requirements, however, earthen
berms may only be practical in cases where a large development can
financially absorb the costs.
The effectiveness of vegetation in mitigating sound impacts has been
the subject of some debate. A
1971 publication by David I. Cook and David Haverbeke, Trees and
Shrubs for Noise Abatement, recommends planting 20 to 50-foot wide
belts of trees and shrubs, located 20 to 50 feet from the center of the
nearest traffic lane. This may be helpful in urban areas where the main
source of noise is the tire-road interaction, but it is less helpful if
truck noise predominates. Along high-speed rural facilities, 65 to
100-foot wide belts of trees and shrubs are recommended. Evergreen
varieties are recommended where year-round screening is desired.
Another option is to erect manmade noise barriers. This is a costly
solution and is only practical when the property developer expects that
the market for the land near the highway will bring high enough prices to
cover the costs of erecting the barrier.
Summary
A multi-pronged approach is needed to address the impacts that traffic
noise can have on a community. A comprehensive plan that includes a
long term vision for the location or expansion of multi-lane arterials
is essential to plan for community noise impacts. In general, the plan
should identify the probable need for new or expanded roads and
minimize the placement of noise sensitive uses near those locations,
especially if truck traffic is expected. An approach commonly used by
communities to determine which uses should or should not be permitted
adjacent to a road involves determining the expected future level of
traffic on a road and comparing that to existing roads carrying
similar volumes and types of traffic. When the placement of noise
sensitive uses near noise sources cannot be completely avoided, local
zoning and subdivision regulations should include special provisions
to minimize noise impacts. A combination of site design, building
layout, acoustical techniques and noise barriers, as described in this
article, are appropriate.
|
This article has been reviewed for form and
content by Rebecca Roberts of the Center for Land Use Education. Any
errors, mistakes and omissions remain the responsibility of the author.
Data Sources:
1 Peterson, A.P.G. and
Gross, Jr., E. E. (1974). Handbook of Noise Measurement. General
Radio, (7th ed.) Concord, MA.
2 Tetra Tech, Inc.
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Chapter 3.06. Available online:
www.ttsfo.com/sbcteis/feis/text/03_06.pdf.
3 Tahoe Regional
Planning Agency. (2001). Threshold Evaluation Report, Chapter 9:
Noise. Available online:
www.trpa.org/documents/Threshold_Eval_2001/9-NOIS%20FINAL.pdf.
4 Danish Wind Industry
Association. Sounds from Wind Turbines. Available online:
www.windpower.org/en/tour/env/sound.htm.
5 International
Standards Organization. (November 1969). Noise Assessment with Respect
to Community Responses. ISO/TC 43. New York: United Nations.
PREVIOUS
ARTICLE |
FRONT PAGE |
NEXT ARTICLE
|