|
|
|
PREVIOUS
ARTICLE |
FRONT PAGE |
NEXT ARTICLE
Comprehensive Planning in
Wisconsin: Are Communities Planning to Protect Their Groundwater?
Part III
by Linda Stoll
Introduction
Over the past two decades, agricultural economics have changed resulting
in changes to farming practices and the trend toward larger herd sizes. At
the same time, development has decreased the amount of land available for
grazing and growing feed crops and has impacted the location and manner in
which farmers
can spread manure. These changes have led to greater confinement of
animals as farmers try to improve animal nutrition and contain and collect
manure.
As livestock
production methods change, environmental management practices must change
as well if we are to protect our valuable land and water resources. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued new regulations for
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations or CAFOs as part of continuing
enforcement of the Clean Water Act. By 2007, these regulations will
require large agricultural operations to create and follow a plan to
improve their water quality, odor emissions and greenhouse gases as part
of the permit process. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)
will enforce these regulations through a revision in NR 243, the existing
state CAFO rules.
This article will focus on a new technology being developed by Skill
Associates, Inc. that consists of a manure management process that
essentially eliminates the need to spread manure and also generates green
energy.
The Issues
Manure management is a critical issue on all farms for on-site management
as well as during disposal. While nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen
are valuable components of manure, and essential for crop growth and
animal production, improper management of manure can lead to
eutrophication of rivers, lakes and estuaries. Eutrophication is the
accelerated �aging� of waters caused by excessive nutrient loading which
causes excessive plant growth, fish kills and reduced aesthetic quality.
Manure may also contain bacteria and chemicals that can affect the health
of humans if they enter surface and ground water. Preventing manure runoff
during rain storms is particularly critical for CAFOs given the amount of
manure these large farms generate. Since one cow produces as much waste as
eighteen people, a single CAFO has as much pollution potential from
untreated waste as the cities of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Rapids, Onalaska
or Ashwaubenon. Increasing development pressure and the resulting loss of
available land for spreading liquid and solid manure could make it
difficult for large farms to comply with these rules.
New
Regulations
The WDNR website lists specific changes to NR 243 that, if approved,
would:
-
Prohibit applying
liquid manure on frozen or snow-covered ground unless it�s injected or
immediately incorporated into the soil and prohibit spreading solid
manure on frozen or snow-covered ground during February and March unless
it�s immediately incorporated.
-
Require six months
of liquid manure storage.
-
Require that
manure spread on land be set back from private and public drinking water
wells and from sinkholes and fractured bedrock. Additional restrictions
would apply to manure and process wastewater spread on areas with
shallow soils.
-
Require farms to
implement nutrient management plans based on applying the right amount
of phosphorus.
-
Require farms
applying manure near lakes and streams to implement practices such as
leaving crop residue on fields to protect against manure runoff.
-
Require farms to
develop an emergency response plan to address manure spills or
discharges.
|
What
is a CAFO?
EPA defines a CAFO as any facility that contains �1,000 animal
units�. What may be confusing is the fact that one �animal unit�
does not necessarily equate to one animal. A unit equivalent is
determined by the weight of an individual type of animal and the
amount of manure that it produces. If an operation has more than 700
dairy cows, 1,000 cattle, 2,500 swine or 125,000 chickens, it falls
under the EPA�s new Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO)
regulations. Wisconsin further defines farms as medium (300 to 999
animal units) and small (fewer than 300 animal units) animal feeding
operations which may also be defined or designated as CAFOs if they
have discharges to navigable waters. |
New
Technology
Meeting these requirements will require a variety of options to address
the volume of manure produced on large farms. The actual nutrient content
of the manure, local slope and soil conditions as well as surrounding
water quality issues will also affect how farmers can address these
issues. The �Elimanure� System� located on the Weise Brothers farm near
Greenleaf, Wisconsin is a new system and the only model in the world that
uses technology similar to that used in the paper industry to dry manure
and then burn the product to produce electricity. This system is different
than a digester which uses an anaerobic process to produce methane and
dried solids as well as a liquid that still must be hauled and land
spread. It uses hot air to dry the manure reducing its moisture content to
40% and in the process, effectively sterilizing the manure. The
end-product can be used for bedding or sent by conveyor to a bio-mass
burner that uses thermal gasification to create steam. Thermal
gasification is the burning of materials in the presence of a limited
amount of air or oxygen, producing a combustible gas. This gas is then
burned to run a boiler that produces steam. The steam is piped to a
turbine that generates electricity that can be used internally in the
operation and can be sold to the local power company. The excess steam can
be used to heat water, heat the operation, and with the use of a heat
exchanger, heat the air that is used to dry the manure. The water from the
condensing stream is recaptured and sent back into the system. The entire
process uses only 8 gallons of fresh water per day. Other than some added
sawdust and electricity at startup, the system is fully self-supporting.
The Weise farm milks 1,500 cows and totals over 3,000 animals in all. They
own 3,000 acres and in the past hauled 4,500 tank trucks of liquid manure
annually. Each truck contained 7,200 gallons of manure which resulted in
approximately 623,077 gallons of manure per week being hauled on local
roads and spread on nearby fields. On site are three manure lagoons each
holding six months of liquid manure. By installing the new technology,
manure will be reduced to an ash by-product that will fill a small 9� x 5�
x 5� wagon 50 times a year � about once every 8 days. The farm has a
contract to sell all the ash to a seed producer who will use the ash to
coat seeds thus eliminating all land spreading of manure from the farm.
The dry manure produced in the first part of the process will be used as
sterile bedding eliminating a significant operational cost. The remainder
will be used to produce electricity to run the operation. Any excess
energy, enough estimated to run 600 homes annually, will be returned to
the grid. Savings will also be gained by producing their own heat and the
hot air needed to dry the manure. Another important by-product of the
system is the elimination of odor from all parts of the farm operation.
This system comes with a large price tag � approximately $4 million.
Because the technology uses standard equipment from other industries and
produces an income as well as a savings in farm expenses, banks have
indicated that they would be willing to offer construction loans for the
process. Money is also available through federal programs. The Weise farm
expects a return on investment in 2.6 years.
Implications
For the Future
This process is still undergoing EPA testing but preliminary numbers
indicate that the minimum size farm needed for profitability would be
1,000 cows with a milking herd of at least 500. The process has an upper
threshold of about 3,000 cows, after which an additional burner and
turbine may be needed to process all of the manure produced. Manure can be
pumped up to a mile to reach the system. It is conceivable that several
nearby farms could join together to support such a system making it
cost-effective for smaller farms to take advantage of the technology. This
system would work for all types of animal waste and has the potential to
process municipal sludge as well. Partnerships between small rural
communities and surrounding farmers could create win-win solutions for
everyone. While some crops may still need fertilizer, the system can
eliminate the need to spread manure in areas where, due to soil type,
slope, ground water and surface water issues, it is inadvisable to do so.
Critical to the expansion of this technology will be the adoption of local
ordinances and regulations that allow its use. Farms wanting to expand and
use this technology will need to be allowed to reach size thresholds that
maximize the technology. This system can play an important part in the
suite of new technology that will be required to produce the food supply
we need while protecting our land and water resources.
The statistics found
in this article and other
NR 243 information can be found on the WDNR website.
Additional
information about the Elimanure�
System can be found at
www.burnmanure.com.
|