INTRODUCTION
When the Social Security
program was signed into law on August 14, 1935 it carried a provision
that created the first Social Security Trust Fund and set forth a
Board of Directors to oversee its operation. The Trust funds were
deemed necessary as a cushion to allow payments between the quarterly
deposits of FICA payroll tax.
The Board is composed of
six members, four of whom serve automatically by virtue of their
positions in the Federal Government: the Secretary of the Treasury,
who is the Managing Trustee, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of
Health and Human Services, and the Commissioner of Social Security.
The other two members are appointed by the President and confirmed by
the Senate to serve as public representatives.
The Board of Trustees
reports each year on the current and projected financial condition of
the Social Security program, which is financed through two separate
trust funds. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund
pays monthly benefits to retired workers and their families and to
survivors of deceased workers. The Disability Insurance (DI) Trust
Fund pays monthly benefits to disabled workers and their families.
The report on the current
financial status of the funds includes an accounting of the actual
income and expenditures for the last year. The projections for future
years reflect the Trustees' considered judgment about all the
demographic, economic, and program factors that affect income and
expenditures. Projections are presented separately for the next 10
years (the short range) and for the next 75 years (the long range).
All projections are based on current Social Security law and do not
anticipate any future changes that Congress might make.
Because any projection of
future experience is uncertain, the Trustees use three alternative
sets of assumptions to show a range of possible outcomes. The
intermediate set of assumptions, designated as alternative II,
reflects the Trustees' best estimate of the trust funds' future
financial outlook; the low cost alternative I is more optimistic, and
the high cost alternative III more pessimistic. This writing is based
on the 2004 Trustees report and will focus on the most likely
assumptions, alternative II.
For the 2004 report, moving
the valuation date from 2003 to 2004 has increased the program's
actuarial deficit and unfunded obligation. Demographic, economic, and
programmatic factors have also been updated with the most recently
available information. Compared to the results shown in last year's
report, projected annual balances for the Social Security program
(income minus costs) are somewhat improved for years after about 2045.
Overall, the projected financial status of the program shows little
change.
OVERVIEW
HIGHLIGHTS
The
report's major findings are summarized below.
In 2003
At the end of 2003, 47
million people were receiving benefits: 33 million retired workers and
their dependents, 7 million survivors of deceased workers, and 8
million disabled workers and their dependents. During the year an
estimated 154 million people had earnings covered by Social Security
and paid payroll taxes. Total benefits paid in 2003 were $471 billion.
Income was $632 billion, and assets held in special issue U.S.
Treasury securities grew to $1.5 trillion.
Short-Range Results
The OASI and DI Trust
Funds, individually and combined, are adequately financed over the
next 10 years under the intermediate assumptions. The combined assets
of the OASI and DI Trust Funds are projected to increase from $1,531
billion at the beginning of 2004, or 306 percent of annual
expenditures, to $3,584 billion at the beginning of 2013, or 442
percent of annual expenditures in that year. Combined assets were
projected in last year's report to rise to 309 percent of annual
expenditures at the beginning of 2004, and 461 percent at the
beginning of 2013.
Long-Range Results
Under the intermediate
assumptions the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds are projected to
become exhausted in 2042. For the 75-year projection period, the
actuarial deficit is 1.89 percent of taxable payroll, 0.03 percentage
point smaller than in last year's report. The open group unfunded
obligation for OASDI over the 75-year period is $3.7 trillion in
present value, $0.2 trillion more than the obligation estimated a year
ago.
Between about 2010 and
2030, OASDI cost will increase rapidly due to the retirement of the
large baby-boom generation. After 2030, increases in life expectancy
and relatively low fertility rates will continue to increase Social
Security system costs, but more slowly. Annual cost will exceed tax
income starting in 2018 at which time the annual gap will be covered
with cash from redeeming special obligations of the Treasury, until
these assets are exhausted in 2042. Separately, the DI fund is
projected to be exhausted in 2029 and the OASI fund in 2044.
Solvency
The combined OASDI Trust
Funds are projected to become insolvent (i.e., unable to pay scheduled
benefits in full on a timely basis) when assets are exhausted in 2042
under the long-range intermediate assumptions. For the trust funds to
remain solvent throughout the 75-year projection period, the combined
payroll tax rate could be increased during the period in a manner
equivalent to an immediate and permanent increase of 1.89 percentage
points, benefits could be reduced during the period in a manner
equivalent to an immediate and permanent reduction of 12.6 percent,
general revenue transfers equivalent to $3.7 trillion (in present
value) could be made during the period, or some combination of
approaches could be adopted. Significantly larger changes would
be required to maintain solvency beyond 75 years.
TRUST FUND
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS IN 2003
The table below shows the
income, expenditures, and assets for the OASI, the DI and the combined
OASDI Trust Funds in calendar year 2003.
|
Table 1.--Summary of
2003 Trust Fund Financial Operations |
|
|
|
Amounts (in billions)
|
|
|
OASI |
DI |
OASDI |
|
|
Assets at the end of 2002 |
$1,217.5 |
$160.5 |
$1,378.0 |
|
|
Total income in 2003 |
543.8 |
88.1 |
631.9 |
|
|
Net contributions |
456.1 |
77.4 |
533.5 |
|
|
Taxation of benefits |
12.5 |
.9 |
13.4 |
|
|
Interest |
75.2 |
9.7 |
84.9 |
|
|
Total expenditures in 2003 |
406.0 |
73.1 |
479.1 |
|
|
Benefit payments |
399.8 |
70.9 |
470.8 |
|
|
Railroad Retirement financial interchange |
3.6 |
.2 |
3.7 |
|
|
Administrative expenses |
2.6 |
2.0 |
4.6 |
|
|
Net increase in assets in 2003 |
137.8 |
15.0 |
152.8 |
|
|
Assets at the end of 2003 |
1,355.3 |
175.4 |
1,530.8 |
|
Note:
Totals do not necessarily equal the sums of rounded components.
In 2003, net contributions
accounted for 84 percent of total trust fund income. Net contributions
consist of taxes paid by employees, employers and the self-employed on
earnings covered by Social Security. These taxes were paid on covered
earnings up to a specified maximum annual amount, which was $87,000 in
2003 and is increased each year automatically (to $87,900 in 2004) as
the average wage increases. The tax rates scheduled under current law
for 2003 and later are shown in table 2.
|
Table 2.--Tax Rates
for 2003 and Later |
|
|
OASI |
DI |
OASDI |
|
Tax rate for employees and employers, each (in percent)
|
5.30 |
0.90 |
6.20 |
|
Tax rate for self-employed persons (in percent) |
10.60 |
1.80 |
12.40 |
Two percent of OASDI Trust
Fund income came from subjecting up to 50 percent of Social Security
benefits above a certain level to Federal personal income taxation,
and 13 percent of OASDI income came from interest earned on investment
of OASDI Trust Fund reserves. Social Security's assets are invested in
interest-bearing securities of the U.S. Government. In 2003 the
combined trust fund assets earned interest at an effective annual rate
of 6.0 percent. More than 98 percent of expenditures from the combined
OASDI Trust Funds in 2003 went to pay retirement, survivor, and
disability benefits totaling $470.8 billion. The financial interchange
with the Railroad Retirement program resulted in a payment of $3.7
billion from the combined OASDI Trust Funds, or about 0.8 percent of
total expenditures. The administrative expenses of the Social Security
program were $4.6 billion, or about 1.0 percent of total expenditures.
Assets of the trust funds
provide a reserve to pay benefits whenever expenditures exceed income.
Assets increased by $152.8 billion in 2003 because income to each fund
exceeded expenditures. At the end of 2003, the combined assets of the
OASI and the DI Trust Funds were 306 percent of estimated expenditures
for 2004.
ASSUMPTIONS
ABOUT THE FUTURE
The actual future income
and expenditures of the OASI and DI Trust Funds depend on many
factors, including the size and characteristics of the population
receiving benefits, the level of monthly benefit amounts, the size of
the work force, and the level of workers' earnings. These factors will
depend in turn upon future birth rates, death rates, immigration,
marriage and divorce rates, retirement-age patterns, disability
incidence and termination rates, productivity gains, wage increases,
inflation, and many other demographic, economic, and program-specific
factors.
Assumptions are reexamined
each year in light of recent experience and new information. This
careful review and updating of the assumptions on an annual basis
helps ensure that they provide the Trustees' best estimate of future
possibilities.
PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE FINANCIAL STATUS
Short-Range Actuarial Estimates
For the short range
(2004-2013), the Trustees measure trust fund adequacy by comparing
assets at the beginning of each year to projected program cost for
that year under the intermediate set of assumptions. Having a trust
fund ratio of 100 percent or more--that is, assets at the beginning of
each year at least equal to projected outgo during the year--is
considered a good indication of a trust fund's ability to cover most
short-term contingencies. Both the OASI and the DI trust fund ratios
under the intermediate assumptions exceed 100 percent throughout the
short-range period and therefore satisfy the Trustees' short-term test
for financial adequacy. Figure 3 below shows the trust fund ratios for
the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds for the next 10 years.
|
Figure 3.--Short-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios
[Assets as a percentage of annual expenditures] |
|
|
Long-Range Actuarial
Estimates
The financial status of the
trust funds over the next 75 years is measured in terms of cost and
income as a percentage of taxable payroll, trust fund ratios, the
actuarial balance (also as a percentage of taxable payroll), and the
open group unfunded obligation (expressed in present-value dollars).
The year-by-year
relationship between income and cost rates shown in figure 4
illustrates the expected pattern of cash flow for the OASDI program
over the full 75-year period. Under the intermediate assumptions, the
OASDI cost rate is projected to decline slightly between 2004 and 2007
and then increase up to the current level within the next 3 years. It
then begins to increase rapidly and first exceeds the income rate in
2018, producing cash-flow deficits thereafter. Despite these cash-flow
deficits, beginning in 2018, redemption of trust fund assets will
allow continuation of full benefit payments on a timely basis until
2042, when the trust funds will become exhausted. This redemption
process will require a flow of cash from the General Fund of the
Treasury. Pressures on the Federal Budget will thus emerge well before
2042. Even if a trust fund's assets are exhausted, however, tax income
will continue to flow into the fund. Present tax rates would be
sufficient to pay 73 percent of scheduled benefits after trust fund
exhaustion in 2042 and 68 percent of scheduled benefits in 2078.
|
Figure 4.--OASDI
Income and Cost Rates Under Intermediate Assumptions
[As a
percentage of taxable payroll] |
|
|
Social Security's cost rate
generally will continue rising rapidly through about 2030 as the
baby-boom generation reaches retirement age. Thereafter, the cost rate
is estimated to rise at a slower rate for about 15 years as the baby
boom ages and begins to decrease in size. Continued reductions in
death rates and relatively low birth rates will cause a significant
upward shift in the average age of the population and will push the
cost rate above 19 percent of taxable payroll by 2078 under the
intermediate assumptions.
In a pay-as-you-go system
such as OASDI, this 19-percent cost rate means the combination of the
payroll tax (scheduled to total 12.4 percent) and proceeds from income
taxes on benefits (expected to be 1.0 percent of taxable payroll in
2078) would have to equal more than 19 percent of taxable payroll to
pay all currently scheduled benefits. After 2078, the upward shift in
the average age of the population is likely to continue and to
increase the gap between OASDI costs and income.
The primary reason that the
OASDI cost rate will increase rapidly between 2010 and 2030 is that,
as the large baby-boom generation born in the years 1946 through 1964
retires, the number of beneficiaries will increase much more rapidly
than the number of workers. The estimated number of workers per
beneficiary is shown in figure 5. In 2003, there were about 3.3
workers for every OASDI beneficiary. The baby-boom generation will
have largely retired by 2030, and the projected ratio of workers to
beneficiaries will be only 2.2 at that time. Thereafter, the number of
workers per beneficiary will slowly decline, and the OASDI cost rate
will continue to increase.
|
Figure 5.--Number
of Covered Workers Per OASDI Beneficiary |
|

|
The maximum projected trust
fund ratios for the OASI, DI, and combined funds appear in table 6.
The chart also contains the year in which the maximum projected trust
fund ratio is attained and the years in which the assets are projected
to be exhausted.
|
Table 6.--Projected
Maximum Trust Fund Ratios Achieved and
Trust Fund Exhaustion Dates Under the Intermediate Assumptions
|
|
|
OASI |
DI |
OASDI |
|
Maximum trust fund ratio (percent) |
500 |
226 |
448 |
|
Year attained |
2015 |
2006 |
2015 |
|
Year of trust fund exhaustion |
2044 |
2029 |
2042 |
The actuarial balance is a
measure of the program's financial status for the 75-year valuation
period as a whole. It is essentially the difference between income and
cost of the program expressed as a percentage of taxable payrolls over
the valuation period. This single number summarizes the adequacy of
program financing for the period. When the actuarial balance is
negative, the actuarial deficit can be interpreted as the percentage
that would have to be added to the current law income rate in each of
the next 75 years, or subtracted from the cost rate in each year, to
bring the funds into actuarial balance. In this report, the actuarial
balance under the intermediate assumptions is a deficit of
1.89 percent of taxable payroll for the combined OASI and DI Trust
Funds. The actuarial deficit was 1.92 percent in the 2003 report and
has been in the range of 1.86 percent to 2.23 percent for the last ten
reports.
Even a 75-year period is
not long enough to provide a complete picture of Social Security's
financial condition. Overemphasis on summary measures for a 75-year
period can lead to incorrect perceptions and to policy prescriptions
that do not move toward a sustainable system. Thus, careful
consideration of the trends in annual deficits and unfunded
obligations toward the end of the 75-year period is important. In
order to provide a more complete description of Social Security's very
long-run financial condition, the Trustees Report also includes
summary measures for a time period that extends to the infinite
horizon. These calculations show that extending the horizon beyond 75
years continues to increase the unfunded obligation, indicating that
much larger changes would be required to achieve solvency over the
infinite future as compared to changes needed to balance 75-year
period summary measures.
Uncertainty of the Projections
Significant uncertainty
surrounds the intermediate assumptions. The Trustees have
traditionally used low cost (alternative I) and high cost (alternative
III) assumptions to indicate this uncertainty. Figure 7 shows the
projected trust fund ratios for the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds
under the intermediate, low cost, and high cost assumptions. The low
cost alternative is characterized by assumptions that improve the
financial condition of the trust funds, including a higher fertility
rate, slower improvement in mortality, a higher real-wage
differential, and lower unemployment. The high cost alternative, in
contrast, features a lower fertility rate, more rapid declines in
mortality, a lower real-wage differential, and higher unemployment.
|
Figure
7.--Long-Range OASDI Trust Fund Ratios Under Alternative
Assumptions
[Assets as a percentage of annual cost] |
|
|
These three alternatives
have traditionally been constructed to provide a reasonable range of
possible future experience. However, these alternatives do not address
the probability that actual experience will be within or outside the
range. As an additional way of illustrating uncertainty, the Trustees
Report includes estimates from a model of the trust funds that
provides a probability distribution of possible future outcomes. The
results of this model suggest that outcomes better than the
traditional low cost alternative and outcomes worse than the high cost
alternative have very low probabilities of occurring.
CONCLUSION
Under current law the cost
of Social Security will increase faster than the program's income,
because of the aging of the baby-boom generation, expected continuing
low fertility, and increasing life expectancy. Based on the Trustees'
best estimate, program cost will exceed tax revenues starting in 2018
and throughout the remainder of the 75-year projection period. Social
Security's combined trust funds are projected to allow full payment of
benefits until they become exhausted in 2042. At that time annual tax
income to the trust funds is projected to equal about 73 percent of
program costs. Separately, the OASI and DI funds are projected to have
sufficient funds to pay full benefits on time until 2044 and 2029,
respectively. By 2078, however, annual tax income is projected to be
only about two-thirds as large as the annual cost of the OASDI
program.
Over the full 75-year
projection period the actuarial deficit estimated for the combined
trust funds is 1.89 percent of taxable payroll--slightly lower than
the 1.92 percent deficit projected in last year's report. This deficit
indicates that financial adequacy of the program for the next 75 years
could be restored if the Social Security payroll tax were immediately
and permanently increased from its current level of 12.4 percent (for
employees and employers combined) to 14.29 percent. Alternatively, all
current and future benefits could be immediately reduced by about 13
percent. Other ways of reducing the deficit include making transfers
from general revenues or adopting some combination of approaches.
-
If no action were taken
until the combined trust funds become exhausted in 2042, much larger
changes would be required. For example, payroll taxes could be
raised to finance scheduled benefits fully in every year starting in
2042. In this case, the payroll tax would be increased to 16.91
percent at the point of trust fund exhaustion in 2042 and continue
rising to 18.31 percent in 2078.
-
Similarly, benefits could
be reduced to the level that is payable with scheduled tax rates in
every year beginning in 2042. Under this scenario, benefits would be
reduced 27 percent at the point of trust fund exhaustion in 2042,
with reductions reaching 32 percent in 2078.
Changes of this magnitude
would eliminate the actuarial deficit over the 75-year period through
2078. However, because of the increasing average age of the
population, Social Security's annual cost will very likely continue to
exceed tax revenues after 2078. As a result, ensuring the
sustainability of the system beyond 2078 would require even larger
changes than those needed to restore actuarial balance for the 75-year
period.
The projected trust fund
deficits should be addressed in a timely way to allow for a gradual
phasing in of the necessary changes and to provide advance notice to
workers. The sooner adjustments are made the smaller and less abrupt
they will have to be. Social Security plays a critical role in the
lives of over 47 million beneficiaries, and 156 million covered
workers and their families. With informed discussion, creative
thinking, and timely legislative action, we will ensure that Social
Security continues to protect future generations.
For further
information related to the contents of this report, see the following
websites.
# # # |