|
The nation's real Gross Domestic Product
grew at a very weak 0.7 percent rate during last quarter.
Further, from fourth quarter 2001 to fourth quarter 2002, real Gross
Domestic Product expanded by only 2.8 percent.
Moreover, the U.S. unemployment rate rose from 5.4 percent to 5.7
percent over the same period. Finally,
U.S. employment growth from December 2001 to December 2002 was nonexistent! Wisconsin faired somewhat better than the nation in terms of
employment growth. Total
employment over the period was estimated to have risen from 2.8 million to 2.9
million, or by 1.8 percent. Though
the unemployment rate in Wisconsin rose from 4.4 percent to 4.9 percent, it
remains lower than the U.S. rate
From a historic standpoint this has been an
anemic period of growth for the national and state economies.
What are the factors that are dampening economic activity; what are the
prospects for the future? Many
economists cite the Iraq situation as a major contributor to the cloud that
now hangs over the economy. Economists
of this persuasion argue that once the Iraq war is over, uncertainty
concerning corporate profits will be reduced.
This will prompt business firms to increase investment, and eventually
start hiring more workers. Moreover,
the majority of economists believe a huge amount of monetary and fiscal
stimulus currently is being applied to the economy.
With a resolution of the Middle Eastern situation, the aforementioned
stimulus should be able to propel the economy forward and should result in
significant gains in employment and income.
Specifically, this school of thought believes
that the combination of low interest rates; the decline of the U.S. dollar in
relation to other major currencies; a larger than expected proposed federal
fiscal stimulus package; a declining backlog of unfilled investment orders; a
recent increase in a purchasing managers index; a strong housing market; and a
very low inflation rate suggests that the economy is poised for a healthy
rebound in the latter part of 2003.
However, not all economists are so optimistic
about our economic prospects in 2003. A
minority of economists holds the opinion that the problems confronting the
economy are deep rooted and are not likely to be resolved in the near term.
This viewpoint maintains that the underlying problem confronting the
U.S. economy stems from the financial excesses of the 1990s.
The financial bubble in our nation's equity markets helped to fuel a
massive amount of business investment. Financial
capital was very easy to raise for most corporations.
The thought of huge potential profits from the information technology
revolution induced investors to throw vast sums of money into a wide array of
business endeavors. The problem,
of course, was that a great deal of overcapacity was created.
In other words, the forecasted demand and profitability never
materialized for many businesses. When it finally became apparent to investors that profits
would not meet expectations, the financial bubble burst. Simply stated, a great deal of investor wealth evaporated
with the collapsing equity values. A
sharp decline in wealth would in and of itself have a depressing impact on
economic activity. However, this
group suggests that the most important aspect emerging out of the collapse is
the amount of lingering overcapacity that plagues a large number of
industries. Until the excess
capacity issue is resolved, many industries will not find it profitable or
necessary to invest in additional factory, plant, equipment, and inventories.
With no need to expand operations they will be very reluctant to hire
additional personnel.
In sum, the pessimists believe it may take an additional number of years
before the economy works off the excesses of the 1990s. Only time will tell if the economic stimulus mentioned
earlier will be powerful enough to overcome the overcapacity issue.
The struggle between these opposing forces will have significant
ramifications for the people of the U.S. |