Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
Picture (42x43, 1017 bytes)
Division of Business and Economics
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, WI 54481
(715) 346-3774  (715) 346-2537
 
 
Randy F. Cray, Ph.D.
Director, Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
 

National and Regional Outlook
4th Quarter 2004

 Table 1

 

When compared to other states, Wisconsin's economic performance was very robust in 2004.  Recently released figures from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics indicate that Wisconsin came in ninth place in terms of jobs creations.  Only eight other states exceeded the state in job creation.  The government reports that Wisconsin added about 64,000 net new positions, a gain of approximately 2.3 percent.  In contrast, the nation added about 1.7 percent to its payrolls. 

What is particularly pleasing about this growth is that manufacturing employment is said to have rebounded by almost 16,000 jobs.  This represents a healthy gain of over 3 percent.  Given the state's high dependence on manufacturing employment, this indeed is welcomed news.  Wisconsin ranks second among the states in terms of its dependence on manufacturing as a source of employment.   

In addition, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue indicates that in 2004 Wisconsin experienced solid economic growth in employment and income.  Moreover, the agency reports that this trend is likely to continue well into 2005.  The Wisconsin Department of Revenue is forecasting that job growth will be approximately 1.8 percent during 2005, and wages and salaries are forecasted to grow by approximately 6 percent.  Once again, if this forecast holds true, it would be welcomed news for the state.   

Why has Wisconsin's and the nation's economy rebounded?  Because of Wisconsin's dependence on manufacturing, the state benefits greatly when the national economy picks up steam.  In other words, Wisconsin manufactures products that are much in demand at the beginning of an upturn in the national business cycle.  In addition, the depreciation of the dollar helps Wisconsin's exporting activity by making its products less expensive to people living outside the country.  The next question to be answered is why has the national economy gained economic momentum.   

The reasons for this overall expansion in the national economy are many.  A few of the more important reasons are as follows.  The Federal Reserve reports that there has been a strong upward trend in spending by households and in their income levels.  Moreover, business firms have definitely pulled out of their investment slump.  It appears that business firms, in anticipation of profits, are once again investing in factories, plants, equipment and inventories.  The economic slump in the early 2000s was predicated upon a retrenchment in business investment.  The Federal Reserve also credits favorable monetary conditions for helping foster the improved climate.  Interest rates are still relatively low, and credit availability remains abundant.  Also, exceptionally strong productivity gains over the last four years have contributed to this expansion.  On average, U.S. worker productivity has grown at over four percent since 2000.  In the long-run, this translates into higher corporate profits and income growth for workers.  The technological revolution in computer aided business procedures has played a key role in this development.

 Another factor playing a key role in the favorable growth forecast is the prospect for low inflation in 2005.  The Federal Reserve and most economic analysts see inflation being lower in 2005 than the 3.3 percent in 2004.  Even though the dollar has declined by approximately 30 percent against a basket of major foreign currencies, which makes imports more expensive, other factors will mitigate this upward pressure on prices.  For example, there is still a significant amount of capacity left in the U.S. economy.  In other words, there remains a good deal of underutilized resources.  Moreover, competition is so strong in most industries that importers are very reluctant to raise prices in fear of losing market share.  Lastly, productivity growth, having been so strong for so long, allows for the dissipation of higher input prices.  Simply stated, if workers are more productive, costs can be spread out over a greater number of units.  Thus, firms can keep prices down and still cover the higher production costs.  Thus, unless some unforeseen economic or political crisis occurs, the most likely economic prognosis for the state and nation appears to be solid economic growth in 2005.  

 
TABLE 1:
NATIONAL ECONOMIC STATISTICS
  2003
Fourth Quarter
2004
Fourth Quarter
Percent
Change
Nominal Gross Domestic Product (Billions) $11,270.9 $11,967.0 +6.2
Real Gross Domestic Product (Billions of 2000 $) $10,580.7 $10,975.7 +3.7
Industrial Production
(1997 = 100)
113.4 117.8 +3.9
Three Month U.S. Treasury Bill Rate

0.92%

2.23% +141.8
Consumer Price Index
(1982-84 = 100)
184.3 190.3 +3.3
 

Back to 4th Quarter 2004 Report

CWERB Home Page

 

E-mail DBE  Phone: (715) 346-2728  Fax: (715) 346-3310  Webmaster
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Division of Business and Economics
Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481