Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
Picture (42x43, 1017 bytes)
Division of Business and Economics
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, WI 54481
(715) 346-3774  (715) 346-2537
 
 
Randy F. Cray, Ph.D.
Director, Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
 

National and Regional Outlook
3rd Quarter 2007

 Table 1

    

     The data in  Table 1 shows that real GDP expanded from $11.3 trillion to $11.6 trillion over the past twelve months or by 2.6 percent.  The output of the nation’s factories increased by approximately 2.0 percent in the third quarter 2006 to the third quarter 2007 comparison.  Meanwhile short-term interest rates declined from 4.77 percent to 3.82 percent over the same period.  Moreover, inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index rose by 2.8 percent.  The inflation rate while moderate is in the upper range of what the Federal Reserve feels is acceptable. 

 

     The year over comparison figures in Table 1 indicate that the economy has performed reasonably well over the past twelve months.  Along the same line the most recent data suggests that the nation’s Gross Domestic Product rose by an unexpectedly healthy 3.9 percent during the July-September 2007 time frame.  Further, 166,000 jobs were created in the nation during October 2007.

 

     However, as I mentioned in a previous report the sub prime housing market was a wild card in terms of any forecast about economic performance.  It appears the collapse of the sub prime housing market is now putting a considerable amount of downward pressure on the economy.

 

     The Federal Reserve has become so concerned by the situation that it has already cut the key federal funds rate twice.  The cuts have lowered this key short-term borrowing rate by 75 basis points.  Thus, the central bank of the United States has temporarily switched its focus from fighting inflation to trying to prevent the economy from slipping into a recession.  In other words, the Federal Reserve is now attempting to provide a sufficient amount of liquidity to offset the negative economic effects of the sub prime housing market collapse.

 

     The Federal Reserve and a number of prominent economists are concerned that the sub prime housing market woes might spread to the broader economy.  How this might happen is very complex.  In brief, the impact of this financial situation cuts across many segments of the economy.  The impact on home owners is not just limited to those who are experiencing foreclosure.  In California, Florida, Texas, the northeastern corridor and large urban areas, home prices are falling.  This means there is less of an opportunity to extract wealth from real estate.  To a large extent the consumption surge that fueled the economy during the post dot-com era bubble and the post 9/11 attack was predicated on consumer spending financed by real estate appreciation.  Household consumption of goods and services accounts for approximately two-thirds of all economic activity, so anything that impacts consumption will have a large influence on economic performance.

 

     The problem, however, goes beyond the home owner.  Major financial institutions like Merrill Lynch, Bear Sterns, Countrywide Financial, and Citi Bank are facing serious financial difficulty because of the sub prime housing market collapse.  In brief the investment in nonperforming real estate backed financial instruments have had a large negative effect on the balance sheets of these and other financial institutions.  In and of itself this is bad for the economy, but it goes further than this.  A more serious problem is that this could make getting credit more difficult for corporations.  In other words an impairment of our nation’s credit market would hamper corporate spending and have a large impact on profits, income and job creation.  This of course would not bode well for the stock market which has been another major source of wealth creation in the United States.  To the extent that people feel less wealthy, whether it be from falling housing prices or a decline in their stock portfolio, it will have a negative influence on household spending.

 

     Lastly no one knows, not even the Federal Reserve, the extent of the fallout from the sub prime housing collapse.  Case in point, some analysts forecast the loss to financial institutions to be in the $400 billion range while others say the loss may amount to only $40 billion.  Clearly there is a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the situation.  However, the Federal Reserve and economists in general are in agreement that the probability of a recession next year has risen.  Some like Alan Greenspan put the probability in the 35-40 percent range.  Only time will tell how this situation plays out.  The best guess is that it will be about mid-2008 before this question can be answered.

 
 
TABLE 1:
NATIONAL ECONOMIC STATISTICS
 

2006
Third Quarter

2007
Third Quarter
Percent
Change
Nominal Gross Domestic Product
(Billions)
$13,266.9 $13,926.7

+5.0

Real Gross Domestic Product
(Billions of 1996 $)
$11,336.7 $11,630.7 +2.6
Industrial Production
(1997 = 100)

112.2

114.4

+2.0
Three Month U.S. Treasury Bill Rate 4.77% 3.82% -19.9
Consumer Price Index
(1982-84 = 100)
202.9 208.5 +2.8
 

Back to 3rd Quarter 2007 Report

CWERB Home Page

 

E-mail DBE  Phone: (715) 346-2728  Fax: (715) 346-3310  Webmaster
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Division of Business and Economics
Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481