Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
Picture (42x43, 1017 bytes)
Division of Business and Economics
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, WI 54481
(715) 346-3774  (715) 346-2537
 
 
Randy F. Cray, Ph.D.
Director, Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
 

National and Regional Outlook
3rd Quarter 200
5

 Table 1

     Last quarter I discussed the economic impact of the gulf hurricanes.  This quarter I would like to elaborate on their effects on the overall state of the economy.  There seems to be a considerable amount of concern over the direction of the national economy.  Everyone should realize that the health of the state and regional economies are very much dependent on the national situation.  Events happening elsewhere in the world have a direct effect upon our lives in Wisconsin.  For example, the gulf hurricanes' impact on energy supplies was quickly felt in our area.  As a result of the disruption in energy supplies, this winter's heating bills are projected to be well above last year's levels; 50 to 70 percent by some forecasts.          

     If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Ben Bernankee will succeed Alan Greenspan on February 1st as the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.  As head of the nation's central bank, Bernankee will play a key role in formulating monetary policy.  The following provides an overview of the economic conditions that the new Federal Reserve chair will face and the issues he likely will have to address.  The gross domestic product grew at a robust 3.8 percent during third quarter of 2005.  For the previous seven quarters GDP had been averaging a 3.7 annualized rate of growth.  Economists generally believe a rate above 3.0 percent represents a healthy amount of expansion.  In contrast, industrial production, another measure of economic activity, experienced anemic growth over the past several quarters.  Industrial production expanded by 1.5 percent and by 1.1 percent in the second and third quarters, respectively.  Also, the leading indicators composite index has been trending lower since early summer.  Moreover, the consumer confidence survey, administered by the University of Michigan, fell dramatically in September.  Clearly the impact of Katrina, Rita, and Wilma weighed heavily upon the minds of the survey's respondents.             

     In addition, the consumer price index rose at an annualized rate of 4.7 percent in September.  If we exclude the volatile energy and food components the core consumer price index increased by 2.0 percent on an annualized basis.  Moreover, unemployment claims were pushed much higher due to the hurricane activity in the gulf.  The U.S. Labor Department reported that over the past two months that there have been over 500,000 claims turned in which can be directly attributed to the gulf storms.             

     The consensus forecast seems to be that the economy will avoid a recession.  That is, many of the hurricane related items will play themselves out and the rebuilding effort in the gulf region will provide a huge amount of stimulus to the economy.  Having said that, a number of analysts are very concerned about upward pressure on the price level and how it may eventually lead to higher wage levels.  This economic environment will force the Federal Reserve to continue its policy of raising interest rates and tightening credit conditions.  This is often enough to slow the economy but also consider that rising interest rates could cause a sharp decline in housing prices.  On the east and west coasts, according to most, a housing bubble exists.  A larger drop in housing prices could cause consumer spending to contract.  Alan Greenspan indicated in a speech that borrowing by consumers against their residences added over $600 billion worth of spending to the economy in 2004.  This represents about 5 percent of GDP.  While no one is suggesting that a rise in interest rates would erase $600 billion worth of spending, it is clear that a sharp decline in housing prices would have a substantial impact on consumer spending.  Given these issues and growing concerns about our dependence on foreign savings to finance domestic expenditures, it is becoming increasingly clear that Benankee and the Federal Reserve will have little room for error in formulating monetary policy. 

 
TABLE 1:
NATIONAL ECONOMIC STATISTICS
 

2004
Third Quarter

2005
Third Quarter
Percent
Change
Nominal Gross Domestic Product
(Billions)
$11,818.8 $12,589.6

+6.5

Real Gross Domestic Product
(Billions of 1996 $)
$10,808.9 $11,193.2 +3.6
Industrial Production
(1997 = 100)
115.7

118.0

+2.0
Three Month U.S. Treasury Bill Rate 1.71% 3.44% +101.2
Consumer Price Index
(1982-84 = 100)
189.9 198.8 +4.7
 

Back to 3rd Quarter 2005 Report

CWERB Home Page

 

E-mail DBE  Phone: (715) 346-2728  Fax: (715) 346-3310  Webmaster
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Division of Business and Economics
Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481