Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
Picture (42x43, 1017 bytes)
Division of Business and Economics
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, WI 54481
(715) 346-3774  (715) 346-2537
 
 
Randy F. Cray, Ph.D.
 
Director, Central Wisconsin Economic Research Bureau
 

National and Regional Outlook
2nd Quarter 2000

 Table 1
     On August 22nd, the Federal Reserve, our nation's central bank, decided not to raise short-term interest rates.  As most people already know, the Federal Reserve has been tightening credit conditions over the past year.  As a matter of fact, the Fed has raised interest rates six times during this period.  By doing so, the Federal Reserve was attempting to cool down the economy and prevent inflation from spiraling out of control.

     Why did the Fed decide not to tighten at its August 22nd meeting?  The reason the Fed decided to back off at the time is of course related to information coming out about the economy.  Even though economic activity continues to expand, there are indications that the pace of expansion is slowing.  In other words, there is evidence that the past tightening by the Fed is starting to take hold.

     Consumer spending, which accounts for two thirds of all activity, is reportedly slowing in several parts of the country.  Moreover, retail activity appears to be leveling off in most parts of the country.  The Fed also reports that manufacturing activity is showing signs that it may be slowing.  Given the tighter credit conditions it comes as little surprise that construction activity is also operating at a slower pace.  This holds true for both residential and nonresidential construction.  Statistics generated by the Federal Reserve also suggest that while bank lending across the country continues to expand the pace is far from alarming.

     The Federal Reserve, and anyone with a passing interest in the economy, knows that labor market conditions are very tight throughout the country.  There is evidence to suggest that wages and benefits have been growing.  However, it appears that gains in productivity have largely offset this pressure.  Thus, inflationary pressure resulting from wage and benefit increases appears to be in check.  Moreover, the Federal Reserve is now forecasting that inflation will run in the 2.50 to 2.75 percent range for the remainder of the year, and that GDP growth will moderate over the last part of the year.

     The evidence at this point in time suggests that past Federal Reserve actions have had the desired effect of moderating aggregate demand to a level that more closely matches the ability of the economy to produce goods and services.  However, the Federal Reserve has indicated while the current situation looks promising the economy is not yet out of the inflationary woods. Even though the probability of future interest rate hikes has lessened, the Federal Reserve has made it very clear that it will not hesitate to raise rates at the first sign of building inflationary pressure.  However, given that this is a presidential election year there is little likelihood that the Federal Reserve will raise rates before November.  To do so would compromise the Fed's stature of being a politically neutral organization.

 
TABLE 1:
NATIONAL ECONOMIC STATISTICS
 
1999
Second Quarter
2000
Second Quarter
Percent
Change
Nominal Gross Domestic Product
(Billions)
$9,191.5
$9,937.3
+8.1
Real Gross Domestic Product
(Billions of 1996 $)
$8,783.2
$9,308.8
+6.0
Industrial Production
(1992 = 100)
134.2
144.8
+7.9
Three Month U.S.Treasury Bill Rate
4.75%
5.68%
+19.6
Consumer Price Index
(1982-84 = 100)
166.2
172.3
+3.7
 
Back to 2nd Quarter 2000 Report

CWERB Home Page

 

E-mail DBE  Phone: (715) 346-2728  Fax: (715) 346-3310  Webmaster
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Division of Business and Economics
Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481