Skip navigation

Guidelines for the Student Affairs Assessment Report for July 1, 2006

Contents:

General Guidelines

  • This report is a follow up to the report you wrote last year. It is intended as a guide for you to reflect on where you are currently and what you want to accomplish for next year. It will also reflect your intended outcomes statements that will be implemented in the fall. If you already have implemented intended outcome statements this year, please include them in your July report.
  • The report will be done by July 1, 2006 (and on a continuing annual basis in the future), to provide evidence of continuous, longitudinal assessment each year using multiple approaches.
  • The assessment process is intended, first of all, for the benefit of our students; second, to provide others with knowledge of the things we are doing well; and third, to meet the North Central Association’s (Higher Learning Commission’s) accreditation guidelines.
  • Our students will benefit by our efforts to gain feedback from them on how well we are delivering our programs, activities, and services to meet the goal of being actively involved in their success at the university and planning changes to better serve them.
  • The assessment report for July 1, 2006 has several parts to it.
    • It will contain a summary of your assessment planning for this year.
    • It will contain a summary of the assessment studies that you carried out this year.
    • It will include your mission, vision, values, and priorities statements.
    • It will include your intended outcomes statements and how these are to be measured.
    • It will contain your future plans, including changes you intend to make as a result of your assessment activities. This looping process is a important part of the report. Please state how you used the data from your assessment results in changing your programs, activities, and services to better serve students/clients/customers.
    • Please continue to carry out satisfaction studies, while adding intended outcomes statements and assessment plans to be implemented in the fall of 2006. If you have already developed and assessed intended outcome statements for this year, please continue this process for next year.
    • Developing intended outcomes statements, using multiple methods of assessment, engaging in longitudinal studies, and looping the results into program change strategies will greatly aid both your students/clients/customers and our preparation for the HLC visit. The HLC (Higher Learning Commission) heavily emphasizes the importance of having intended outcomes statements for you programs, activities, and services and demonstrating the looping process in assessment.
Back to Top

Four Recommendations

  • Use some form of an assessment planning and evaluation model, such as the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model
    • Begin with the context (C)of your planning statements for your department (vision, mission, values, and priorities) and evaluate those planning statements (Context Evaluation).
    • Use inputs (I) in the assessment planning process (data from earlier studies; feedback from students, staff, faculty, parents, or others; your perceptions; analysis of the CAS Standards, etc.) and evaluate them (Input Evaluation).
    • Implement the process (P) of delivery of programs/services/activities and evaluate them (Process Evaluation).
    • Obtain study results on the products (P) or outcomes of your programs/services/activities. Revise your programs/services/activities based on your assessment findings (Product Evaluation).
    • “Loop” back to your planning statements (vision, mission, values, and priorities) to see what revisions you would like to make in them.
  • Use Your Satisfaction Survey This Year as a Baseline for Intended Outcomes Statements for Next Year.
    • There are several benefits to this practice
      • it will help you establish a baseline for next year’s assessment work
      • it will help in developing a longitudinal approach with baseline data each year.
      • it will aid in writing intended outcomes statements, by basing some of your assessment goals and objectives on improving results on your present satisfaction survey for next year.
      • for example, a goal for next year could be, “ We will have a increase of 10% in student satisfaction in the area of providing useful information to them in a timely manner on our Student Satisfaction Survey to be given in November, 2006”.
      • This helps your assessment goals be more specific and measurable, as well as providing a standard or criterion to meet..
      • Consider doing a web-based satisfaction survey.
  • Carry out Tracking and Counts of the Use of Your Services and Participation in your Programs and Activities
    • These numbers can be very helpful in describing the use of your services and participation by students and others.
    • They can also help you see patterns of use and areas that you might want to focus on or to change in the future.
  • Consult with the chair of UWSP’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) before engaging in your study about the instruments you plan to use.
Back to Top

Review of Several Key Concepts from North Central Association (Higher Learning Commission) Accreditation Process

  • The assessment process contributes to continuous improvement.
  • The assessment process uses longitudinal data, involving the same survey data over multiple years (benchmarking data is also helpful in this regard).
  • The assessment process focuses on intended outcomes, whether in the area of student learning, programs, activities, student development, or services.
  • The assessment focuses on a “looping” process, in which assessment results are “looped” back to the vision, mission, values, and priorities for review and evaluation.
  • The assessment process focuses on multiple methods of assessment (i.e., surveys, focus groups, observations, interviews, tracking, counts).
  • The assessment process is integral to the overall planning of each area, including the establishment of priorities for each year.
Back to Top

Components of the July 1, 2006 Report

  • List the planning statements for your department/area
    • Mission
    • Vison
    • Values
    • Priorities (Goals and Objectives)
  • Summarize how your planning statements relate to budget development (if appropriate for your unit/department)
    • State the relationship of priorities (goals and objectives) to budget decisions (if appropriate for your department/area).
    • State the relationship of departmental/area priorities to the mission of the department and mission of Student Affairs.
  • Summarize the relationship of your assessment plans to your priorities (goals and objectives).
    • State the major purposes of the assessments.
    • Summarize how your assessment plans relate to your priorities (goals and objectives).
  • Summarize the Assessments Done This Year
    • State each assessment study that was carried out this year
    • Provide a description of the assessment study
    • Provide a summary of the assessment results
    • Provide a summary of the evaluation of the assessment results
    • List a contact person for each assessment study
  • Future Plans
    • New goals, priorities, and intended outcome statements for next year in the area of assessment.
    • Alterations/changes in your programs/services/activities as a result of the assessments.
Back to Top